Rebaza-Magán YC, Reátegui-Navarro MA, Jiménez-Prado CA, Guillén-Galarza MF, Vargas-Cornejo HM. CBCT Evaluation of the Relationship Between Mandibular Molars and the Inferior Alveolar Canal in a Peruvian Population. J Clin Exp Dent. 2026;18(5):e655-61.

doi:10.4317/jced.64037

___

References

1. Vranckx M, Geerinckx H, Gaêta-Araujo H, Leite AF, Politis C, Jacobs R. Do anatomical variations of the mandibular canal pose an increased risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury after third molar removal?. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(1):931-937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04076-3 PMid:34279700

2. Chua M, Koh W, Nimbalkar S, Patil P. CBCT Evaluation of buccolingual orientation of inferior alveolar canal in mandibular posterior region for implant planning. Int J Dent. 2022;1(1):4682105. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4682105 PMid:36065398 PMCid:PMC9440803

3. Angammana R, Jayasinghe R. Bilateral inferior alveolar canal variations detected by Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Case Report. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023;22(2):365-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-023-01865-z PMid:37122792 PMCid:PMC10130278

4. Asghar A, Priya A, Ravi K, Iwanaga J, Tubbs R, Naaz S et al. An evaluation of mandibular canal variations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anat Sci Int. 2023;98(2):176-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-022-00682-7 PMid:36038792

5. Saber SE, Abu El Sadat S, Taha A, Nawar NN, Abdel Azim A. Anatomical analysis of mandibular posterior teeth using CBCT: An endo-surgical perspective. Eur Endod J. 2021;6(3):264-270. https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2021.40427 PMid:34967336 PMCid:PMC8842422

6. Ekstrand KR, Christiansen J, Christiansen MEC. Time and duration of eruption of first and second permanent molars: A longitudinal investigation. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31(5):344-350. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00016.x PMid:14667005

7. Kalabalık F, Yılmaz N, Aydın EG, Aytuğar E. Investigation of root apical closure of first permanent molars with cone-beam computed tomography: A retrospective study. J Dent Sci. 2024;19(4):2172-2178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2024.03.010 PMid:39347050 PMCid:PMC11437274

8. Gaêta-Araujo H, Leite AF, Vasconcelos KF, Jacobs R. Two decades of research on CBCT imaging in DMFR: An appraisal of scientific evidence. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021;50(4):20200367. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200367 PMid:33555198 PMCid:PMC8077993

9. Moreira-Souza L, Butini Oliveira L, Gaêta-Araujo H, Almeida-Marques M, Asprino L, Oenning AC. Comparison of CBCT and panoramic radiography for the assessment of bone loss and root resorption on the second molar associated with third molar impaction: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022;51(3):20210217. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210217 PMid:34520245 PMCid:PMC8925877

10. Kaasalainen T, Ekholm M, Siiskonen T, Kortesniemi M. Dental cone beam CT: An updated review. Phys Med. 2021;88(1):193-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.007 PMid:34284332

11. Razumova S, Brago A, Howijieh A, Barakat H, Kozlova Y, Razumov N. Evaluation the relationship between mandibular molar root apices and mandibular canal among residents of the moscow population using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography technique. Contemp Clin Dent. 2022;13(1):3-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_388_19 PMid:35466297 PMCid:PMC9030301

12. Díaz D, Theilheimer A. Relación anatómica del conducto mandibular y ápices radiculares: análisis con CBCT en población guatemalteca. Rev Odont Mex. 2021;25(4):306-312. https://doi.org/10.22201/fo.1870199xp.2021.25.4.75639

13. Sharaan ME, Abdulla AY, Ragab MH. Assessment of the relationship of the distance between mandibular first and second molars with the inferior alveolar canal and cortical bone plate in an Egyptian subpopulation: a CBCT study. Braz Oral Res. 2022;36(1):e033. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0033 PMid:35352763

14. Aqili TM, Almuzaini ES, Aljohani AS, Al Saeedi AK, Hammudah HA, Alassaf M et al. Evaluation of the variations of mandibular molars and the distance from root apex to the inferior alveolar nerve in Saudi Sub-population: Three-dimensional radiographic evaluation. PLoS One. 2025;20(2):e0317053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317053 PMid:39970167 PMCid:PMC11838894

15. Sánchez B, Díaz J, Villanueva MC, De la Fuente H, Sarmiento L, Sánchez A et al. Morphometric relationships between the mandibular canal and the molar teeth: A tomographic analysis report. Int J Morphol. 2017;35(2):564-570. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000200030

16. Vidya KC, Pathi J, Rout S, Sethi A, Sangamesh NC. Inferior alveolar nerve canal position in relation to mandibular molars: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2019;10(2):168-174. https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_53_17 PMid:31798251 PMCid:PMC6883893

17. Guzmán J, Abarca J, Navarro P, Garay I, Arnabat-Domínguez J, Betancourt P. Morphometric analysis of the mandibular canal and its anatomical variants in a Chilean subpopulation: Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Diagnostics. 2024;14(17):1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171914 PMid:39272699 PMCid:PMC11394078

18. Hiremath H, Agarwal R, Hiremath V, Phulambrikar T. Evaluation of proximity of mandibular molars and second premolar to inferior alveolar nerve canal among central Indians: A cone-beam computed tomographic retrospective study. Indian J Dent Res. 2016;27(3):312-316. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.186240 PMid:27411662