Carranza-Buenaño C, Ortiz-Pizarro M, Carruitero-Honores MJ. Factors associated with orthodontist’s decision to indicated orthodontic camouflage or orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III malocclusions without growth. J Clin Exp Dent. 2026;18(9):e1052-9.

doi:10.4317/jced.64160

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.64160

References

1. Faria-Teixeira MC, Azevedo-Coutinho F, Serrano AD, Yáñez-Vico RM, Salvado E Silva F, Vaz-Carneiro A, Iglesias-Linares A. Orthognathic surgery-related condylar resorption in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion versus class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):72.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06061-8
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04921-3
PMid:39819590


2. Li X, Tian Y, Guo R, Li W, He D, Sun Y. Evaluation of the facial profile of skeletal Class III patients undergoing camouflage orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study. PeerJ. 2024;12:e17733.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17733
PMid:39071135 PMCid:PMC11283169


3. Zhou X, Chen S, Zhou C, Jin Z, He H, Bai Y, Li W, Wang J, Hu M, Cao Y, Liu Y, Yan B, Shi J, Guo J, Li Z, Ma W, Liu Y, Li H, Lu Y, Ren L, Zou R, Xu L, Hu J, Wu X, Cui S, Xu L, Wang X, Zhu S, Hu L, Tang Q, Song J, Fang B, Chen L. Expert consensus on early orthodontic treatment of class III malocclusion. Int J Oral Sci. 2025;17(1):20.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-023-00228-1
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-025-00357-9
PMid:40164594 PMCid:PMC11958775


4. Reis GM, de Freitas DS, Oliveira RC, de Oliveira RCG, Pinzan-Vercelino CRM, Freitas KMS, Valarelli FP. Smile attractiveness in class III patients after orthodontic camouflage or orthognathic surgery. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(12):6791-6797.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03966-w
PMid:33959816


5. Voon KKR, Lim AAT, Wong HC, Sim YF, Foong KWC. Decision-making patterns among expert and novice orthodontists and oral maxillofacial surgeons in the management of adults with Class III malocclusions and moderate degree of skeletal discrepancies. J Orthod. 2023;50(4):410-422.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125231181603
PMid:37357426

6. Alam MK, Nowrin SA, Shahid F, AlHarby H, Abutayyem H, Alswairki HJ, El-Din Mohamed SK. Orthognathic versus camouflage treatment of class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Appl Sci. 2022;12(7):3314.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073314


7. Liu H, Zhang Y, Lu W, Yang Y, Liu X, Chen S, Li W, Han B. Lower incisor position in skeletal class III malocclusion patients: a comparative study of orthodontic camouflage and orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 2024;94(5):504-511.
https://doi.org/10.2319/122523-856.1
PMid:39230016 PMCid:PMC11363981

8. Saab FJ, de Freitas DS, Cotrin P, Oliveira RC, Valarelli FP, de Oliveira RCG, Salmeron S, Pinzan-Vercelino CRM, Freitas KMS. Comparison of gingival recession of mandibular incisors of class III patients immediately after compensatory or surgical orthodontic treatment. Eur J Dent. 2023;17(4):1089-1096.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758068
PMid:36574782


9. Bendersky J, Zapata S, Uribe M, Villanueva J, Bonfill X, Souper R. Evidence gaps in orthognathic surgery: an international Delphi study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025;54(5):430-437.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2024.11.001
PMid:39603881

10. Stojanovic Z, Đorđević N, Bubalo M, Stepovic M, Rancic N, Misovic M, Gardasevic M, Vulovic M, Zivanovic Macuzic I, Rosic V, Vunjak N, Delic S, Jovanovic K, Tepavcevic M, Marinkovic I, Rajkovic Pavlovic Z. The therapeutic approaches dealing with malocclusion type III-narrative review. Life (Basel). 2025;15(6):840.
https://doi.org/10.3390/life15060840
PMid:40566493 PMCid:PMC12193839


11. Ortiz-Pizarro M, Neira-Garcia D, Farfan-Valdez K, Bonilla-Feria N, Flores-Rodriguez JJ, Rodríguez-Díaz DR, Serna-Alarcón V. Thickness of soft and hard tissues on palate of patients with different facial types: a cone beam computed tomography study. J Int Dent Med Res. 2024;17(3):1192-1197.

12. Taraji S, Atici SF, Viana G, Kusnoto B, Allareddy VS, Miloro M, Elnagar MH. Novel machine learning algorithms for prediction of treatment decisions in adult patients with class III malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;81(11):1391-1402.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2023.07.137
PMid:37579914


13. Lee H, Ahmad S, Frazier M, Dundar MM, Turkkahraman H. A novel machine learning model for class III surgery decision. J Orofac Orthop. 2024;85(4):239-249.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-022-00421-7
PMid:36018345 PMCid:PMC11186927

14. Kauser A, Tiwari RVC, Khandelwal A, Tiwari H, Joshi SR, Baig FAH, Managutti A. Preference of orthodontic treatment versus orthognathic surgery in class III malocclusion cases: a research survey. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2021;8(1):1271-1276.


15. Liang Y, Zhang R, Wang S, Zhang Y, Han B, Liu X. Evaluation of a safe decompensation range for mandibular incisors during presurgical orthodontic treatment for severe skeletal class III malocclusion: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2026;169(4):440-457.e2.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.10.015
PMid:41528284

16. Cirignaco G, Paglianiti M, Catarzi L, Betti E, Monarchi G, Gilli M, Vaira LA, Consorti G. Patient satisfaction in orthognathic surgery and the role of expectations. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2026;54(6):104530.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2026.104530
PMid:41806541


17. Gao Q, Zhou X, Zhao Z, Chen B, Huang M, Lin H, Guo W, Liu C. Comparison of the mandibular retromolar space in adults with different sagittal skeletal types and eruption patterns of the mandibular third-molar: a cone-beam computed tomography study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1112.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04815-4
PMid:39300426 PMCid:PMC11412046

18. Verma SL, Tikku T, Khanna R, Srivastava K, Maurya RP, Rai P. Correlation of mandibular third molar orientation and available retromolar space with arch length discrepancy in subjects with different growth pattern. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2024;15(1):106-115.
https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_63_22
PMid:38690237 PMCid:PMC11057591

19. Gao H, Bi D, Al-Watary MQH, Song L, Sun X, Zhao Q, Li J. Morphological changes of the mandibular angle after orthognathic surgery with class III deformity in East Asia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024;48(5):816-826.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03658-8
PMid:37758853

20. Ravelo V, Parra M, Muñoz G, Otero JJ, Olate S. Mandibular contouring in subjects with class II or class III dentofacial deformities and treatment needs. J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(6):1725-1729.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010441
PMid:38949262

21. Park H, Jo H, Park JH, Jung YS, Kim JY. Effect of proximal segment osteotomy level on mandibular angle changes after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: a three-dimensional CBCT study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025;53(12):2170-2177.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.09.017
PMid:41109761

22. Sun T, Geng Y, Ma H. An enhanced digital surgical planning approach for long-curve mandibular angle osteotomy. J Craniofac Surg. 2026;37(3-4):611-615.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012059
PMid:41773836

23. Lee J, Choi YJ, Yu HS, Lee S, Lee JH, Park SH, Chung CJ, Kim KH. Changes in occlusal function after surgical and nonsurgical treatment of anterior crossbite: a 2-year follow-up. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2025;168(4):489-504.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.04.025
PMid:40423605

24. Cheng YM, Hsieh YL, Chang YH, Chen YH, Yu JH. Impact of orthodontic treatment on masticatory muscle electromyographic patterns in patients with anterior crossbite. J Dent Sci. 2026;21(1):374-382.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2025.09.012
PMid:41585193 PMCid:PMC12826009

25. Nguyen M, Al-Moghrabi D, Tomlinson L, Azami N, Dolce C, Abu Arqub S. Early orthodontic treatment practices and perceptions: a cross-sectional survey of AAO members. J Orthod. 2025;52(3):285-294.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125251358832
PMid:40891912

26. Smyth RSD, Ryan FS, Barber SK, Cunningham SJ. Information provision for orthognathic treatment by consultant orthodontists in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland: a questionnaire-based study. J Orthod. 2026;53(1):9-19.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125251391432
PMid:41305854 PMCid:PMC12999983

27. Lohia A, Shetty S, Singh A, Shetty S, Ashith MV. Evaluation of the level of agreement between clinical diagnosis and two cephalometric analyses: cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery (COGS) and soft tissue cephalometric analysis (STCA). Int J Dent. 2025;2025:8655040.
https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/8655040
PMid:40125093 PMCid:PMC11928218

28. Liu L, Liu Y, Guo K, Ma H, Yang F. Soft and hard tissue changes after compensatory treatment in skeletal class III malocclusion. PLoS One. 2025;20(5):e0322551.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322551
PMid:40333773 PMCid:PMC12057865

29. Lin HY, Yang SP, Chang ZC, Yao CC, Kok SH, Chen YJ. Critical factors to ensure stable occlusion in class III patients following surgical-orthodontic treatment. J Dent Sci. 2026;21(1):341-349.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2025.09.003
PMid:41585115 PMCid:PMC12825514

30. Rivero-Millán P, Barrera-Mora JM, Espinar-Escalona E, González-Del Pino CA, Martín-Salvador D, Llamas-Carreras JM. Comparison of condylar position in normal occlusion, class II division 1, class II division 2 and class III malocclusions using CBCT imaging. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(12):e1216-e1226.
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.58970
PMid:34987714 PMCid:PMC8715563