Guerrero-Torres M, Olaciregui-Hernandez MC, Lizarazo PA, Eljadue-Machuca SS. Dimensional bone changes in ST1 and ST2 extraction sockets treated with an extracellular matrix: A CBCT-based observational pilot study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2026;18(10):e1198-206.

doi:10.4317/jced.64270

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.64270

References

1. Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites: An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(9):809-18.
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00366.x
PMid:12956657


2. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction: An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):212-8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x
PMid:15691354


3. Couso-Queiruga E, Stuhr S, Tattan M, Chambrone L, Avila-Ortiz G. Post-extraction dimensional changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48(1):126-44.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13390
PMid:33067890


4. Tan WL, Wong TLT, Wong MCM, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 5:1-21.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.x
PMid:22211303


5. Couso-Queiruga E, Graham ZA, Peter T, Gonzalez-Martin O, Galindo-Moreno P, Avila-Ortiz G. Effect of periodontal phenotype characteristics on post-extraction dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge: A prospective case series. J Clin Periodontol. 2023;50(5):694-706.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13781
PMid:36644815

6. Steigmann L, Di Gianfilippo R, Steigmann M, Wang HL. Classification based on extraction socket buccal bone morphology and related treatment decision tree. Materials (Basel). 2022;15(3):733.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15030733
PMid:35160679 PMCid:PMC8836467


7. Apaza-Bedoya K, Magrin GL, Romandini M, Blanco-Carrión J, Magalhães Benfatti CA. Efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation with xenografts and resorbable socket sealing materials in the esthetic region: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024;26(1):4-14.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13257
PMid:37674334

8. Del Fabbro M, Tommasato G, Pesce P, Ravidà A, Khijmatgar S, Sculean A, Galli M, Antonacci D, Canullo L. Sealing materials for post-extraction site: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(2):1137-54.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04262-3
PMid:34825280 PMCid:PMC8816783


9. Badylak SF. The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material. Biomaterials. 2007;28(25):3587-93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.043
PMid:17524477

10. Mansour A, Mezour MA, Badran Z, Tamimi F. Extracellular matrices for bone regeneration: A literature review. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017;23(23-24):1436-51.
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0026
PMid:28562183


11. Madi M, Almindil I, Alrassasi M, Alramadan D, Zakaria O, Alagl AS. Cone-beam computed tomography and histological findings for socket preservation techniques using different grafting materials: A systematic review. J Funct Biomater. 2023;14(5):282.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14050282
PMid:37233391 PMCid:PMC10218799

12. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, for the STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296
PMid:17941714


13. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
PMid:27330520

14. MacBeth ND, Donos N, Mardas N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration or socket seal technique: A randomised, single-blind controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(7):681-99.
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13933
PMid:35488477 PMCid:PMC9541021


15. MacBeth N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Donos N, Mardas N. Hard and soft tissue changes following alveolar ridge preservation: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(8):982-1004.
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12911
PMid:27458031

16. Aguilar Porta M, Burelli MP, Urdapilleta M, Gómez M, Olmedo DG. Reliability of a novel stent-based tomographic method to measure dimensional changes after alveolar ridge preservation in extraction sockets with buccal bone dehiscence. Imaging Sci Dent. 2026;56(1):45-53.
https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20250208
PMid:41928843 PMCid:PMC13040222


17. Donos N, Akcali A, Padhye N, Sculean A, Calciolari E. Bone regeneration in implant dentistry: Which are the factors affecting the clinical outcome? Periodontol 2000. 2023;93(1):26-55.
https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12518
PMid:37615306

18. Chang H, Kim S, Hwang JW, Kim S, Koo KT, Kim TI, Seol YJ, Lee YM, Ku Y, Lee JH, Rhyu IC. Comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017;47(3):165-73.
https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.3.165
PMid:28680712 PMCid:PMC5494311

19. Eeckhout C, Seyssens L, Glibert M, Keppens L, Nollet B, Lambert M, Cosyn J. A randomized controlled trial comparing collagen matrix to hemostatic gelatin sponge as socket seal in alveolar ridge preservation. J Clin Med. 2024;13(8):2293.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082293
PMid:38673566 PMCid:PMC11051156

20. Couso-Queiruga E, Mansouri CJ, Alade AA, Allareddy TV, Galindo-Moreno P, Avila-Ortiz G. Alveolar ridge preservation reduces the need for ancillary bone augmentation in the context of implant therapy. J Periodontol. 2022;93(6):847-56.
https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.22-0030
PMid:35289400 PMCid:PMC9322559