Lins LBC, Neves PTO, Acioli ACR, Bezerra ALCA, Casado BGS, Leão RS. Influence of printing angle on the mechanical and surface properties of 3D-printed hybrid resins for indirect restorations: An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2026;18(9):e1142-7.

doi:10.4317/jced.64422

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.64422

References

1. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):3-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
PMid:22119539


2. Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review. J Prosthodont. 2016;27(1):35-41.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12527
PMid:27483210 PMCid:PMC11402722


3. Pellizzer EP, Mello CC de, Gomes JM de L, Santiago Júnior JF, Lemos CAA, Verri FR. Vertical and horizontal misfit analysis of 3-unit FDP fabricated with different techniques and CAD/CAM systems. Braz Dent J. 2018;29:342-6.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201801916
PMid:30462759


4. Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression—a split-mouth randomised clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(11):4043-4050.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02840-0
PMid:30796587


5. Dahl BE, Dahl JE, Rønold HJ. Internal fit of three-unit fixed dental prostheses produced by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing and the lost-wax metal casting technique assessed using the triple-scan protocol. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018;126(1):66-73.
https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12394
PMid:29171091

6. Zeltner M, Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Özcan M, Hämmerle CHF, Benic GI. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(3):354-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.028
PMid:27677220


7. Rödiger M, Heinitz A, Bürgers R, Rinke S. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(2):579-87.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1924-y
PMid:27469102

8. Gjelvold B, Chrcanovic BR, Korduner EK, Collin-Bagewitz I, Kisch J. Intraoral digital impression technique compared to conventional impression technique. A randomized clinical trial. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(4):282-7.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12410
PMid:26618259


9. Ahlholm P, Lappalainen R, Lappalainen J, Tarvonen PL, Sipilä K. Challenges of the direct filling technique, adoption of CAD/CAM techniques, and attitudes toward 3D printing for restorative treatments among Finnish dentists. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32(5):402-10.
https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6343
PMid:31486810

10. Steinmassl PA, Klaunzer F, Steinmassl O, Dumfahrt H, Grunert I. Evaluation of currently available CAD/CAM denture systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(2):116-22.
https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5031
PMid:28267817 PMCid:PMC12326098


11. Barazanchi A, Li KC, Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Waddell JN. Additive technology: update on current materials and applications in dentistry. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(2):156-63.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12510
PMid:27662423

12. Revilla-Leon M, Meyers MJ, Zandinejad A, Ozcan M. A review on chemical composition, mechanical properties, and manufacturing work flow of additively manufactured current polymers for interim dental restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(1):51-7.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12438
PMid:30367716


13. de Castro EF, Nima G, Rueggeberg FA, Giannini M. Effect of build orientation in accuracy, flexural modulus, flexural strength, and microhardness of 3D-printed resins for provisional restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022;136:105479.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105479
PMid:36279743

14. Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS, Ferracane JL, Bertassoni LE. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018;34(2):192-200.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.003
PMid:29110921 PMCid:PMC5801146


15. Letcher T, Waytashek M. Material property testing of 3D-printed specimen in PLA on an entry-level 3D printer. ASME Digital Collection. 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2014-39379

16. Tymrak BM, Kreiger M, Pearce JM. Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des. 2014;58:242-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038


17. Safai L, Cuellar JS, Smit G, Zadpoor AA. A review of the fatigue behavior of 3D printed polymers. Addit Manuf. 2019;28:87-97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.023

18. Suksuphan P, Krajangta N, Didron PP, Wasanapiarnpong T, Rakmanee T. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of milled and 3D-printed CAD/CAM hybrid dental crown materials with various occlusal thicknesses. J Prosthodont Res. 2023;68(2):326-335.
https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_23_00089
PMid:37438119

19. Aati S, Shrestha B, Fawzy A. Cytotoxicity and antimicrobial efficiency of ZrO2 nanoparticles reinforced 3D printed resins. Dent Mater. 2022;38(8):1432-42.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.030
PMid:35792014

20. Lins LBC, Leão RS, Pellizzer EP, Vasconcelos BCE, de Moraes SLD. Effect of three-dimensional print angle on integrity of interim crowns: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(5):1567-76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.07.023
PMid:39181773

21. Saadoun N, Farag MSMS, Badawy RES. Evaluation of a three-dimensional printable and two CAD/CAM hybrid resin materials used as permanent unit tooth restoration: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25:1228.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06544-8
PMid:40696319 PMCid:PMC12281697

22. Derban P, Negrea R, Rominu M, Marsavina L. Influence of the printing angle and load direction on flexure strength in 3D printed materials for provisional dental restorations. Materials. 2021;14(12):3376.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123376
PMid:34207167 PMCid:PMC8233949

23. Mudhaffer S, Haider J, Satterthwaite J, Silikas N. Effects of print orientation and artificial aging on the flexural strength and flexural modulus of 3D printed restorative resin materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(5):1345-1357.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.008
Pmid:39366837

24. Diken Turksayar AA, Donmez MB, Olcay EO, Demirel M, Demir E. Effect of printing orientation on the fracture strength of additively manufactured 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses after aging. J Dent. 2022;124:104155.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104155
Pmid:35526752

25. de Castro EF, Nima G, Rueggeberg FA, Araújo-Neto VG, Faraoni JJ, Palma-Dibb RG, Giannini M. Effect of build orientation in gloss, roughness and color of 3D-printed resins for provisional indirect restorations. Dent Mater. 2023;39(7):e1-e11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.05.002
Pmid:37248138

26. Bollen CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13:258-69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3
Pmid:11696906

27. Khanlar LN, Gholami M, Yavari A, Ozer M. Surface roughness and shear bond strength to composite resin of additively manufactured interim restorative material with different printing orientations. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(5):788-95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.08.010
Pmid:34602276

28. Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(6):760-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.002
Pmid:26803175

29. Ozer NE, Ergun G, Yalcin Y, Yetimoglu E. Bacterial adhesion to composite resins produced by additive and subtractive manufacturing. Odontology. 2024;112(2):460-71.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-023-00862-5
Pmid:37819468

30. Gad MM, Al-Thobity AM, Rahoma A, Abualsaud R, Al-Harbi FA, Akhtar S. Reinforcement of PMMA denture base material with a mixture of ZrO2 nanoparticles and glass fibers. Int J Dent. 2019;2489393.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2489393
PMid:30809260