Canullo L, Pace F, Coelho P, Sciubba E, Vozza I. The influence of platform
switching on the biomechanical aspects of the implant-abutment system. A three dimensional finite element study. Med
Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.
2011 Sep 1;16 (6):e852-6.
doi:10.4317/medoral.17243
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.17243
1. Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated
implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:401-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01022.x
PMid:15248874
2. Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Gröndahl K, Albrektsson T. A
qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year
retrospective analysis of the Brånemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
1997;12:504-14.
PMid:9274079
3. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, Medina R,
Schenk RK, Buser D, et al. Peri-implant
inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res. 2006;85:473-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500515
PMid:16632764
4. Isidor
F. Influence of forces on peri-implant bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17Suppl
2:8-18.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01360.x
PMid:16968378
5. Vigolo P, Givani A.
Platform-switched restorations on wide-diameter implants: a 5-year clinical
prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Implants. 2009;24:103-9.
PMid:19344032
6. Canullo L, Rasperini G.
Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues
using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: a
proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up. Int
J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:995-1000.
PMid:18271382
7. Vela-Nebot X, Rodríguez-Ciurana
X, Rodado-Alonso C, Segalá -Torres
M. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant
Dent. 2006;15:313-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000226788.19742.32
PMid:16966906
8. Canullo L, Quaranta A, Teles RP. The microbiota associated
with implants restored with platform switching: a preliminary report. J Periodontol. 2010;81:403-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090498
PMid:20192867
9. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching:
a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative
crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics
Restorative Dent. 2006;26:9-17.
PMid:16515092
10. Atieh
MA, Ibrahim HM, Atieh AH. Platform switching
for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. J Periodontol.
2010;81:1350-66.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100232
PMid:20575657
11. Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform
switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a
randomized-controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res.
2010;21:115-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01867.x
PMid:20070752
12. Maeda Y, Miura J, Taki I, Sogo M. Biomechanical
analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:581-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01398.x
PMid:17608737
13. RodrÃguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot
X, Segalà -Torres M, Rodado-Alonso
C, Méndez-Blanco V, Mata-Bugueroles
M. Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption
related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment
configurations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.
2009;29:479-87.
PMid:19888491
14. Huang HL, Huang JS, Ko
CC, Hsu JT, Chang CH, Chen MY. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide
implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:466-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01124.x
PMid:16117772
15. Hermann F, Lerner H, Palti A.
Factors influencing the preservation of the periimplant
marginal bone. Implant Dent. 2007;16:165-75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318065aa81
PMid:17563507
16. Canullo L, Iurlaro G, Iannello G. Double-blind randomized controlled trial study
on post-extraction immediately restored implants using the switching platform
concept: soft tissue response. Preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:414-20.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01660.x
PMid:19298296
17. Schrotenboer J, Tsao
YP, Kinariwala V, Wang HL. Effect of microthreads and platform switching on crestal
bone stress levels: a finite element analysis. J Periodontol. 2008;79:2166-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.080178
PMid:18980526
18. Hoyer SA, Stanford CM, Buranadham S, Fridrich T, Wagner J, Gratton
D. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint
opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:599-607.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.115250
PMid:11404760
19. Brink J, Meraw SJ, Sarment DP. Influence of implant diameter on
surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:563-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01283.x
PMid:17590162
20. Chun HJ, Shin HS, Han CH, Lee SH. Influence of implant
abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions
using finite element analysis. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Implants.
2006;21:195-202.
PMid:16634489