Akpınar KE, Altunbaş D, Kuştarcı A. The efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments and H-files to remove gutta-percha from root canals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 May 1;17 (3):e506-11.

doi:10.4317/medoral.17582

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.17582

1. Stabholz A, Friedman S. Endodontic retreatment--case selection and technique. Part 2: Treatment planning for retreatment. J Endod. 1988;14:607-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80058-X

2. Bergenholtz G, Lekholm U, Milthon R, Hedèn G, Ödesjö B, Engström B. Retreatment of endodontic fillings. Scand J Dent Res. 1979;87:217-24.
PMid:293884

3. Fenoul G, Meless GD, Pérez F. The efficacy of R-Endo rotary NiTi and stainless-steel hand instruments to remove gutta-percha and Resilon. Int Endod J. 2010;43:135-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01653.x
PMid:20078702

4. de Oliveira DP, Barbizam JV, Trope M, Teixeira FB. Comparison between gutta-percha and resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreatment. J Endod. 2006;32:362-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.006
PMid:16554213

5. Imura N, Kato AS, Hata GI, Uemura M, Toda T, Weine F. A comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment. Int Endod J. 2000;33:361-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00320.x
PMid:11307212

6. Kosti E, Lambrianidis T, Economides N, Neofitou C. Ex vivo study of the efficacy of H-files and rotary NiTi instruments to remove gutta-percha and four types of sealer. Int Endod J. 2006;39:48-54.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01046.x
PMid:16409328

7. Saad AY, Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Katheeri NH. Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in the removal of Gutta-Percha during root canal retreatment. J Endod. 2007;33:38-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.08.012
PMid:17185127

8. Bergmans E, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Wevers M, Lambrechts P. Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale, performance and safety. Status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 2001;14:324-33.
PMid:11803999

9. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32:271-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1

10. Robertson D, Leeb IJ, McKee M, Brewer E. A clearing technique for the study of root canal systems. J Endod. 1980;6:421-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(80)80218-4

11. Peters OA, Laib A, Gohring TN, Barbakow F. Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by highresolution computed tomography. J Endod. 2001;27:1-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200101000-00001
PMid:11487156

12. Hülsmann M, Bluhm V. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J. 2004;37:468-76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00823.x
PMid:15189436

13. Hülsmann M, Stotz S. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J. 1997;30:227-33.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb00702.x

14. Sae-Lim V, Rajamanickam I, Lim BK, Lee HL. Effectiveness of ProFile .04 taper rotary instruments in endodontic retreatment. J Endod. 2000;26:100-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200002000-00010

15. Ferreira JJ, Rhodes JS, Ford TR. The efficacy of gutta-percha removal using ProFiles. Int Endod J. 2001;34:267-74.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00379.x
PMid:11482137

16. Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Three-dimensional evaluation of effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for retreatment of canals filled with different materials. J Endod. 2008;34:1370-3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.024
PMid:18928849

17. Marfisi K, Mercade M, Plotino G, Duran-Sindreu F, Bueno R, Roig M. Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals. Int Endod J. 2010;43:1022-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01758.x
PMid:20726911

18. Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Meyer KM, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E. Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. J Endod. 2006;32:469-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.052
PMid:16631851

19. Tamse A, Unger U, Metzger Z, Rosenberg M. Gutta-percha solvents--a comparative study. J Endod. 1986;12:337-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80033-4

20. Zakariasen KL, Brayton SM, Collinson DM. Efficient and effective root canal retreatment without chloroform. J Can Dent Assoc. 1990;56:509-12.
PMid:2369702

21. Wennberg A, Orstavik D. Evaluation of alternatives to chloroform in endodontic practice. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1989;5:234-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1989.tb00367.x

22. Hunter KR, Doblecki W, Pelleu GB Jr. Halothane and eucalyptol as alternatives to chloroform for softening gutta-percha. J Endod. 1991;17:310-1.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81696-1

23. Somma F, Cammarota G, Plotino G, Grande NM, Pameijer CH. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials. J Endod. 2008;34:466-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.008
PMid:18358899

24. Unal GC, Kaya BU, Taç AG, Keçeci AD. A comparison of the efficacy of conventional and new retreatment instruments to remove gutta-percha in curved canals: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2009;42:344-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01518.x
PMid:19220515

25. de Carvalho Maciel AC, Zaccaro Scelza MF. Efficacy of automated versus hand instrumentation during root canal retreatment: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2006;39:779-84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01148.x
PMid:16948663

26. Masiero AV, Barletta FB. Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment. Int Endod J. 2005;38:2-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00878.x
PMid:15606816

27. Bueno CE, Delboni MG, de Araújo RA, Carrara HJ, Cunha RS. Effectiveness of rotary and hand files in gutta-percha and sealer removal using chloroform or chlorhexidine gel. Braz Dent J. 2006;17:139-43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402006000200011
PMid:16924342

28. Taşdemir T, Er K, Yildirim T, Celik D. Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals. Int Endod J. 2008;41:191-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01335.x
PMid:18081812

29. Gergi R, Sabbagh C. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing guttapercha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2007;40:532-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01254.x
PMid:17511787

30. Yared GM, Dagher FEB, Machtou P. Failure of ProFile instruments used with high and low torque motors. Int Endod J. 2001;34:471-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00420.x
PMid:11556515