Alió-Sanz J, Iglesias-Conde C, Lorenzo-Pernía J, Iglesias-Linares A, Mendoza-Mendoza A,
Solano-Reina E. Effects
on the maxilla and cranial base caused by cervical headgear. A
longitudinal study. Med Oral Patol Oral
Cir Bucal. 2012 Sep 1;17 (5):e845-51.
doi:10.4317/medoral.17698
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.17698
1. Culbert MR. A simple, efficient headgear of vinyl plastic
belting. Am J Orthod. 1949;35:776-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(49)90149-9
2. Bollen AM. Interceptive
orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusions is slightly more successful
with headgear/biteplane than with bionator
treatment. J Evid Based Dent Pract.
2011;11:58-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2010.11.010
PMid:21420018
3. Abed Y, Brin I. Early headgear effect on the eruption pattern of maxillary second
molars. Angle Orthod.
2010;80:454-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/100509-555.1
PMid:20482348
4. Armi P, Cozza P, Baccetti T. Effect of RME and headgear treatment on the
eruption of palatally displaced canines: a randomized
clinical study. Angle Orthod.
2011;81:370-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/062210-339.1
PMid:21299387
5. Godt A, Koos B, Hagen H,
Göz G. Changes in upper airway width associated with
Class II treatments (headgear vs activator) and
different growth patterns. Angle Orthod.
2011;81:440-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/090710-525.1
PMid:21261483
6. Poulton DR. The influence of extraoral traction. Am J Orthod. 1967;53:8-18
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(67)90135-2
7. Wieslander L. The effect of
force on craniofacial development. Am J Orthod.1974;65:531-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90034-7
8. Mitani H, Brodie AG. Three planeanalysis
of tooth movement growth and angular changes with cervical traction. Angle orthod. 1970;40:80-94.
PMid:5266017
9. Baumrind S, Korn EL,
Isaacson RJ, West EE, Molthen R. Quantitative
analysis of the orthodontic and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:384-98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(93)90002-O
10. Uçem TT, Yüksel S. Effects of different vectors of forces applied by
combined headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:316-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70303-8
11. Droschl H. The effect of heavy orthopedic forces on the maxilla in the growing
Saimiri sciureus (squirrel
monkey). Am J Orthod.
1973;63:449-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(73)90158-9
12. Triftshauser R, Walters RD.
Cervical retraction of the maxilla in the Macaca mulatta monkey using heavy orthopedic force. Angle Orthod. 1976;46:37-46.
PMid:814848
13. Meldrum RJ. Alterations in the upper facial growth of Macaca mulatta resulting from
high-pull headgear. Am J Orthod.
1975;67:393-411.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(75)90021-4
14. Badell MC. An evaluation of extraoral combined
high-pull traction and cervical traction to the maxilla. Am J Orthod. 1976;69:431-46.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(76)90210-4
15. Melsen B. Effects of
cervical anchorage during and after treatment: an implant study. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:526-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(78)90242-7
16. Baumrind S, Molthen R, West EE, Miller DM. Distal displacement of the
maxilla and the upper first molar. Am J Orthod.
1979;75:630-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(79)90095-2
17. Bishara SE, Ziaja RR. Functional appliances: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 1989;95:250-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90055-3
18. Tulloch JF, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in
Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:340-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81491-X
19. Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T, Hurmerinta K, Haavikko K. Orthopedic cervical headgear with an expanded
inner bow in class II correction. Angle Orthod.
2000;70:317-25.
PMid:10961782
20. Pirttiniemi P, Kantomaa
T, Mäntysaari R, Pykäläinen
A, Krusinskiene V, Laitala
T, et al. The effects of early headgear treatment on dental arches and
craniofacial morphology: an 8 year report of a randomized study. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27:429-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji025
PMid:15961567
21. Wieslander L, Buck DL. Physiologic recovery after
cervical traction therapy.Am J Orthod.
1974;66:294-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90294-2
22. de Almeida-Pedrin RR, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, de Almeida MR, McNamara JA Jr. Effects of the pendulum
appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed
appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:833-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.032
PMid:19962606
23. Boecler PR, Riolo ML,
Keeling SD, Tenhave TR.
Skeletal changes associated with extraoral appliance
therapy: an evaluation of 200 consecutively treated cases. Angle
Orthod. 1989;59:263-70.
PMid:2596748
24. Hixon
EH. Cephalometrics: a perspective. Angle Orthod. 1972;42:200-11.
PMid:4504537
25. Alió-Sanz J, Iglesias-Conde C, Pernía
JL, Iglesias-Linares A, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Solano-Reina E. Retrospective study
of maxilla growth in a Spanish population sample. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir
Bucal. 2011;16:e271-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e271
26. Lima Filho RM, Lima AL, de Oliveira
Ruellas AC. Longitudinal study of anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes in skeletal
class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical
headgear. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:187-93.
PMid:12725376
27. Mäntysaari R, Kantomaa
T, Pirttiniemi P, Pykäläinen
A. The effects of early headgear treatment on dental arches and craniofacial
morphology: a report of a 2 year randomized study. Eur
J Orthod. 2004;26:59-64.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.1.59
28. Haralabakis NB, Sifakakis IB. The effect of cervical
headgear on patients with high or low mandibular
plane angles and the “myth” of posterior mandibular
rotation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:310-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.08.028
PMid:15356494
29. Braun S, Bottrel JA. Pilot
study evaluating the effects of a cervical headgear on the C-axis. The growth axis of the dentomaxillary
complex. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:694-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.029
PMid:15592217
30. Mann KR, Marshall SD, Qian F, Southard KA,
Southard TE. Effect of maxillary anteroposterior
position on profile esthetics in headgear-treated patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop. 2011;139:228-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.04.031
PMid:21300252