Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Maestre-Ferrín L,
Peñarrocha-Oltra D, von Arx
T, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Influence of hemostatic agents
upon the outcome of periapical surgery: Dressings
with anesthetic and vasoconstrictor or aluminum chloride. Med
Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.
2013 Mar 1;18 (2):e272-8.
doi:10.4317/medoral.18002
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.18002
|
1. Witherspoon DE, Gutmann JL. Haemostasis in periradicular
surgery. Int Endod J.
1996;29:135-49. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Kim S, Rethnam S. Hemostasis
in endodontic microsurgery. Dent Clin North Am.
1997;41:499-511. |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Sauveur G, Roth F, Sobel
M, Boucher Y. The control of haemorrhage at the
operative site during periradicular surgery. Int Endod J. 1999;32:225-28. |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Lemon RR, Steele PJ, Jeansonne BG. Ferric
sulphate hemostasis:
effect on osseous wound healing. I. Left in situ for maximum exposure. J Endod. 1993;19:170-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Vickers FJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall G. Hemostatic
efficacy and cardiovascular effects of agents used during endodontic surgery.
J Endod. 2002;28:322-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Vy CH, Baumgartner JC, Marshall G.
Cardiovascular effects and efficacy of a hemostatic
agent in periradicular surgery. J Endod. 2004;30:379-83. |
|
|
|
|
|
7. von Arx T, Jensen SS, Hänni
S, Schenk RK. Haemostatic agents used in periradicular
surgery: an experimental study of their efficacy and tissue reactions. Int Endod J. 2006;39:800-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Pescatore C. A predictable gingival
retraction system. Compend Contin
Educ Dent. 2002;23:7-12. |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Shannon A. Expanded clinical uses of a novel tissue-retraction
material. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002;23:3-6. |
|
|
|
|
|
10. Jensen SS, Yazdi PM, Hjørting-Hansen
E, Bosshardt DD, von Arx
T. Haemostatic effect and tissue reactions of methods and agents used for haemorrhage control in apical surgery. Int Endod J. 2010;43:57-63. |
|
|
|
|
|
11. von Arx T, Kurt B. Root-end cavity
preparation after apicoectomy using a new type of
sonic and diamond-surfaced retrotip: a 1-year
follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:656-61. |
|
|
|
|
|
12. Eriksen HM. Endodontology--epidemiologic
considerations. Endod Dent Traumatol.
1991;7:189-95. |
|
|
|
|
|
13. Penarrocha Diago M, Ortega Sanchez B,
Garcia Mira B, Marti Bowen E, von Arx T, Gay Escoda C. Evaluation of healing criteria for success
after periapical surgery. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir
Bucal. 2008;13:E143-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
14. Ortega-Sanchez B, Penarrocha-Diago M,
Rubio-Martinez LA, Vera-Sempere
JF. Radiographic
morphometric study of 37 periapical
lesions in 30 patients: validation of success criteria. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:846-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
15. Rubinstein RA, Kim S. Long-term follow-up of cases considered
healed one year after apical microsurgery. J Endod. 2002;28:378-83. |
|
|
|
|
|
16. Rud J, Andreasen
JO, Jensen JE. A follow-up study of 1,000 cases treated by endodontic
surgery. Int J Oral Surg. 1972;1:215-28. |
|
|
|
|
|
17. Jesslén P, Zetterqvist
L, Heimdahl A. Long-term results of amalgam versus
glass ionomer cement as apical sealant after apicectomy. Oral Surg Oral Med
Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;79:101-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
18. Lindeboom JA, Frenken
JW, Kroon FH, van den Akker
HP. A comparative prospective randomized clinical study of MTA and IRM as
root-end filling materials in single-rooted teeth in endodontic surgery. Oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:495-500. |
|
|
|
|
|
19. Chong BS, Pitt Ford TR, Hudson MB. A prospective clinical study of
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and IRM when used as root-end filling materials in
endodontic surgery. Int Endod
J. 2003;36:520-6. |
|
|
|
|
|
20. von Arx T, Jensen S, Hänni
S. Clinical and radiographic assessment of various predictors for healing
outcome 1 year after periapical surgery. J Endod. 2007;33:123-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
21. Saunders WP. A prospective clinical study of periradicular
surgery using mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling. J Endod. 2008;34:660-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
22. Kim E, Song JS, Jung IY, Lee SJ, Kim S. Prospective clinical study
evaluating endodontic microsurgery outcomes for cases with lesions of endodontic
origin compared with cases with lesions of combined periodontal-endodontic
origin. J Endod.
2008;34:546-51. |
|
|
|
|
|
23. Wang N, Knight K, Dao T, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics-The Toronto Study. Phases
I and II: apical surgery. J Endod. 2004;30:751-61. |
|
|
|
|
|
24. von Arx T, Hänni
S, Jensen S. Correlation of bone defect dimensions with healing outcome one
year after apical surgery. J Endod. 2007;33:1044-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
25. Molven O, Halse
A, Grung B. Observer strategy and the radiographic classification
of healing after endodontic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;16:432-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
26. Tsesis I, Faivishevsky
V, Kfir A, Rosen E.
Outcome of surgical endodontic treatment performed by a modern technique: a
meta-analysis of literature. J Endod. 2009;35:1505-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
27. von Arx T, Peñarrocha M, Jensen S.
Prognostic factors in apical surgery with root-end filling: a meta-analysis. J Endod. 2010;36:957-73. |
|
|
|
|
|
28. Abdel Gabbar F, Aboulazm
SF. Comparative study on gingival retraction using mechanochemical
procedure and pulsed Nd = YAG laser irradiation. Egypt Dent J. 1995;41:1001-6. |
|
|
|
|
|
29. Kopac I, Cvetko
E, Marion L. Gingival inflammatory response induced by chemical retraction
agents in beagle dogs. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:14-9. |
|