Scribante A, Sfondrini MF, Gatti S, Gandini P. Disinclusion of unerupted teeth by mean of self-ligating brackets: Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Jan 1;18 (1):e162-7. 

 

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.18246

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.18246

 

 

 

1. Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J Orthod. 2003;30:262-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ortho/30.3.262
PMid:14530427

 

2. Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:470.e1-8.

 

3. Harradine NW. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res. 2001;4:220-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0544.2001.40406.x
PMid:11683811

 

4. Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:395-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.018
PMid:17346597

 

5. Hobson RS, Ledvinka J, Meechan JG. The effect of moisture and blood contamination on bond strength of a new orthodontic bonding material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:54-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.115037
PMid:11455378

 

6. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater. 1993;9:295-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90046-S

 

7. Sayinsu K, Isik F, Sezen S, Aydemir B. Light curing the primer-beneficial when working in problem areas? Angle Orthod. 2006;76:310-3.
PMid:16539560

 

8. Faltermeier A, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Reicheneder C, Müssig D. An in vitro comparative assessment of different enamel contaminants during bracket bonding. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:559-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm052
PMid:17873148

 

9. Sayinsu K, Isik F, Sezen S, Aydemir B. Effect of blood and saliva contamination on bond strength of brackets bonded with a protective liquid polish and a light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:391-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.049
PMid:17346596

 

10. Sfondrini MF, Gatti S, Scribante A. Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets and disinclusion buttons. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;49:404-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.06.011
PMid:20655131

 

11. Hormati AA, Fuller JL, Denehy GE. Effects of contamination and mechanical disturbance on the quality of acid-etched enamel. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;100:34-8.
PMid:6985623

 

12. Jobalia SB, Valente RM, de Rijk WG, BeGole EA, Evans CA. Bond strength of visible light-cured glass ionomer orthodontic cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:205-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70247-6

 

13. Millett DT, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, McColl J. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:58-63.
PMid:10022186

 

14. Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Scribante A, De Angelis M, Klersy C. Effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125:357-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.022
PMid:15014415

 

15. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8

 

16. Chalgren R, Combe EC, Wahl AJ. Effects of etchants and primers on shear bond strength of a self-ligating esthetic orthodontic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:577.e1-5. 17. Northrup RG, Berzins DW, Bradley TG, Schuckit W. Shear bond strength comparison between two orthodontic adhesives and self-ligating and conventional brackets. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:701-6.

 

18. Sfondrini MF, Gatti S, Scribante A. Shear bond strength of self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:71-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq041
PMid:20660129

 

19. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, De Angelis M, Klersy C. Effects of blood contamination on the shear bond strengths of conventional and hydrophilic primers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:207-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.022
PMid:15316476

 

20. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possibile substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res. 1983;62:1076-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620101501
PMid:6352757

 

21. Vicente A, Toledano M, Bravo LA, Romeo A, de la Higuera B, Osorio R. Effect of water contamination on the shear bond strength of five orthodontic adhesives. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15:e820-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.15.e820
PMid:20173708

 

22. Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Cacciafesta V, Gandini P. Shear bond strength of deciduous and permanent bovine enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13:227-30.
PMid:21734954

 

23. Wegehaupt F, Gries D, Wiegand A, Attin T. Is bovine dentine an appropriate substitute for human dentine in erosion/abrasion tests? J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:390-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01843.x
PMid:18405276

 

24. Naujoks R, Schade H, Zelinka F. Chemical composition of different areas of the enamel of deciduous and permanent teeth. (The content of Ca, P, CO2, Na and N2.) Caries Res. 1967;1:137-43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000259508
PMid:5232603

 

25. Nelson DG. The influence of carbonate on the atomic structure and reactivity of hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res. 1981;60:1621–9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002203458106000312011
PMid:6943172

 

26. Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Belanger GK. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:514-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70171-4

 

27. Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL. Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent. 1994;7:175-9.
PMid:7993609

 

28. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Von Wald L. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:552-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70083-0

 

29. Mirzakouchaki B, Kimyai S, Hydari M, Shahrbaf S, Mirzakouchaki-Boroujeni P. Effect of self-etching primer/adhesive and conventional bonding on the shear bond strength in metallic and ceramic brackets. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e164-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17024
PMid:21743430 PMCid:3448178

 

30. Oztoprak MO, Isik F, Sayinsu K, Arun T, Aydemir B. Effect of blood and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with 4 adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:238-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.035
PMid:17276865

 

31. Wilson PR, Beynon AD. Mineralization differences between human deciduous and permanent enamel measured by quantitative microradiography. Arch Oral Biol 1989;34:85–8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(89)90130-1

 

32. Tarazona B, Paredes V, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandía JL. Influence of first and second premolar extraction or non-extraction treatments on mandibular third molar angulation and position. A comparative study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15:e760-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.15.e760
PMid:20383098