Olivares A, Vicente A, Jacobo C, Molina SM, Rodríguez A, Bravo LA. Canting of the occlusal plane: Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 May 1;18 (3):e516-20.

doi:10.4317/medoral.18335

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.18335

1. Ackerman MB, Ackerman JL. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:221-36.
PMid:12025359

2. Abu Alhaija ES, Al-Shamsi NO, Al-Khateeb S. Perceptions of Jordanian laypersons and dental professionals to altered smile aesthetics. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:450-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq100
PMid:21041837

3. Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent. 1999;11:311-324.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00414.x

4. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga M I, Lagravere MO, Major PW. Layperson's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Orthod. 2004;31:204-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/146531204225022416
PMid:15489364

5. Schabel BJ, Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Subjective vs objective evaluations of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:S72-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.040
PMid:19362269

6. Mack MR. Perspective of facial esthetics in dental treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75:169-76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90095-5

7. Albino J E, Tedesco L A, Conny D J. Patient perceptions of dento- facial esthetics: shared concerns in orthodontics and prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;82:9-13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90172-0

8. Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127:343-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.013
PMid:15775949

9. Pinho S, Ciriaco C, Faber J, Lenza M A. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:748-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.039
PMid:18068592

10. Ioi H, Nakata S, Counts AL. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese. Angle Orthodontist. 2009;79:628-633.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/080708-410.1
PMid:19537873

11. Ritter DE, Gandini LG, Pinto Ados S, Locks A. Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:198-203.
PMid:16539542

12. Martin AJ, Buschang PH, Boley JC, Taylor RW, McKinney TW. The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:530-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm063
PMid:17974544

13. Michiels LY, Tourne LP. Nasion true vertical: a proposed method for testing the clinical validity of cephalometric measurements applied to a new cephalometric reference line. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1990;5:43-52.
PMid:2373912

14. Yogosawa F. Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1990;60:199-06.
PMid:2389852

15. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. Angle Orthod.1991;61:43-8.
PMid:2012321

16. Masuoka N, Momoi Y, Ariji Y, Nawa H, Muramatsu A, Goto S, et al. Can cephalometric indices and subjective evaluation be consistent for facial asymmetry? Angle Orthod. 2005;75:651-55.
PMid:16097236

17. Lee MS, Chung DH, Lee JW, Cha KS. Assessing soft-tissue characteristics of facial asymmetry with photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138:23-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.029
PMid:20620830

18. Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:557-63.
PMid:16808559

19. Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Asok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:515-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.046
PMid:18405815

20. Geron S, Atalia W. Influence of sex on the perception of oral and smile esthetics with different gingival display and incisal plane inclination. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:778-84.
PMid:16283815

21. Peck S, Peck L. Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:105-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(95)80097-2

22. Padwa BL, Kaiser MO, Kaban LB. Occlusal cant in the frontal plane as a reflection of facial asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:811-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90338-4

23. Ker AJ, Chan R, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosenstiel S. Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson's perspective: A computer-based survey study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1318-27.
PMid:18832267