Hernández-Sayago E, Espinar-Escalona E, Barrera-Mora JM, Ruiz-Navarro MB, Llamas-Carreras JM, Solano-Reina E. Lower incisor position in different malocclusions and facial patterns. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Mar 1;18 (2):e343-50.

doi:10.4317/medoral.18434

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.18434

1. Harvold EP. The role of function in the etiology and treatment of malocclusion. Am J Orthod. 1968;54:883-98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(68)90241-8

2. Corelius M, Linder-Aronson S. The relationship between incisor inclination and various reference lines. Angle Orthod. 1976;46:111-7.
PMid:1064340

3. Bibby RE. Incisor relationship in different skeletofacial patterns. Angle Orthod. 1980;50:41-4.
PMid:6928352

4. Bjork A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42:400-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345630420014701
PMid:13971295

5. Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB. Intrinsic craniofacial compensations. Angle Orthod. 1971;41:271-85.
PMid:5286714

6. Sinclair PM, Little RM. Dentofacial maturation of untreated normals. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:146-56.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90239-8

7. Casko JS, Shepherd WB. Dental and skeletal variation within the range of normal. Angle Orthod. 1984;54:5-17.
PMid:6584051

8. Kim JY, Lee SJ, Kim TW, Nahm DS, Chang YI. Classification of the skeletal variation in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:311-9.
PMid:15898366

9. Ishikawa H, Nakamura S, Iwasaki H, Kitazawa S, Tsudaka H, Sato Y. Dentoalveolar compensation related to variations in sagittal jaw relationships. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:534-8.
PMid:10593444

10. Knösel M, Attin R, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Sadat-Khonsari R. Cephalometric assessment of the axial inclination of upper and lower incisors in relation to the third-order angle. J Orofac Orthop. 2007;68:199-209.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-007-0635-z
PMid:17522804

11. Handelman CS. The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:95-109.
PMid:8712499

12. Turvey T, Hall DJ, Fish LC, Epker BN. Surgical-orthodontic treatment planning for simultaneous mobilization of the maxilla and mandible in the correction of dentofacial deformities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982;54:491-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(82)90185-2

13. Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Br J Orthod. 1980;7:145-61.
PMid:6934010

14. Takada K, Petdachai S, Sakuda M. Changes in dentofacial morphology in skeletal Class III children treated by a modified maxillary protraction headgear and a chin cup: a longitudinal cephalometric appraisal. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:211-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/15.3.211
PMid:8339762

15. Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM. Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: profile analysis and mandibular surgery. Angle Orthod. 1976;46:1-25.
PMid:766671

16. Aki T, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Nanda SK. Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:60-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70022-2

17. Yamada C, Kitai N, Kakimoto N, Murakami S, Furukawa S, Takada K. Spatial relationships between the mandibular central incisor and associated alveolar bone in adults with mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod. 2007;77:766-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/072906-309
PMid:17685772

18. Jacobson A. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod. 1975;67:125-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(75)90065-2

19. Biradar AK, Madanagowda SB. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis. World J Orthod. 2010;11:e104-13.
PMid:21490979

20. Lahlou K, Bahoum A, Makhoukhi MB, Aalloula el H. Comparison of dentoalveolar protrusion values in Moroccans and other populations. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:430-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp113
PMid:20018796

21. Ioi H, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts AL. Comparison of cephalometric norms between Japanese and Caucasian adults in antero-posterior and vertical dimension. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:493-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm059
PMid:17974539

22. Knösel M, Jung K. On the relevance of "ideal" occlusion concepts for incisor inclination target definition.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:652-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.12.021
PMid:22051485

23. Knösel M, Engelke W, Attin R, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Sadat-Khonsari R, Gripp-Rudolph L. A method for defining targets in contemporary incisor inclination correction. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:374-80.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn015
PMid:18678757

24. Betzenberger D, Ruf S, Pancherz H. The compensatory mechanism in high-angle malocclusions: A comparison of subjects in the mixed and permanent dentition. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:27-32.
PMid:10022181

25. Schulhof RJ, Allen RW, Walters RD, Dreskin M. The Mandibular Dental Arch: part I, lower incisor position. Angle Orthod. 1977;47:280-7.
PMid:270296

26. Solow B, Tallgren A. Dentoalveolar morphology in relation to craniocervical posture. Angle Orthod. 1977;47:157-64.
PMid:268948

27. Tweed CH. The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1946;32:175-230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0096-6347(46)90001-4

28. Hasund A, Ulstein G. The position of the incisors in relation to the lines NA and NB in different facial types. Am J Orthod. 1970;57:1-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(70)90200-9

29. Schudy ff. The rotation of the mandible resulting from growth: Its Implications in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1965;35:36-50.
PMid:14258830