Bonifácio CC, Hesse D, Bönecker M, Van Loveren C, Van Amerongen WE, Raggio DP. A preliminary clinical
trial using flowable glass-ionomer
cement as a liner in proximal-ART restorations: The operator effect. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 May 1;18 (3):e529-32.
doi:10.4317/medoral.18497
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.18497
|
1. Frencken JE, Van 't
Hof MA, Van Amerongen WE, Holmgren CJ.
Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition:
a meta-analysis. J Dent
Res. 2004;83:120-3. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
2. van 't Hof MA, Frencken
JE, van Palenstein Helderman
WH, Holmgren CJ. The atraumatic restorative
treatment (ART) approach for managing dental caries: a meta-analysis. Int Dent J. 2006;56:345-51. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
3. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal
V, Banerjee A. Atraumatic
restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic
review. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14:233-40. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
4. Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM, Yip HK, Smales RJ. Survival of glass ionomer
restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic
restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year
results. Int Dent J. 2004;54:42-6. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
5. Ersin NK, Candan
U, Aykut A, Oncag O, Eronat C, Kose T. A clinical
evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer
cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results
at 24 months. J Am Dent
Assoc. 2006;137:1529-36. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
6. de Amorim RG, Leal SC, Frencken JE. Survival of atraumatic
restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:429-41. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
7. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. How effective
is ART in the management of dental caries? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999;27:423-30. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
8. Salama
FS, Riad MI, Abdel Megid
FY. Microleakage and marginal gap formation
of glass ionomer resin restorations. J Clin Pediatr
Dent. 1995;20:31-6. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
9. Roeleveld AC, van Amerongen
WE, Mandari GJ. Influence of residual caries and
cervical gaps on the survival rate of Class II glass ionomer
restorations. Eur Arch Paediatr
Dent. 2006;7:85-91. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
10. Mhaville RJ, van Amerongen
WE, Mandari GJ. Residual caries and marginal
integrity in relation to Class II glass ionomer
restorations in primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7:81-4. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
11. Bonifacio CC, Kleverlaan
CJ, Raggio DP, Werner A, de Carvalho
RC, van Amerongen WE. Physical-mechanical
properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. Aust
Dent J. 2009;54:233-7. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
12. Bonifacio CC, van Amerongen
WE, Meschini TG, Raggio
DP, Bonecker M. Flowable
glass ionomer cement as a liner: improving marginal
adaptation of atraumatic restorative treatment
restorations. J Dent
Child (Chic). 2010;77:12-6. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
13. Lenzi TL BC, van Amerongen
WE, Bönecker M, Nogueira
FN, Raggio DP. Flowable
glass ionomer cement layer bonding to sound and
caries affected primary dentin. Journal
of Dental Child (Chicago). 2012. (in press) |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
14. Frencken JE, Makoni
F, Sithole WD. Atraumatic
restorative treatment and glass-ionomer sealants in
a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe:
evaluation after 1 year. Caries Res.
1996;30:428-33. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
15. Frencken JE, Makoni
F, Sithole WD, Hackenitz
E. Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe. Caries Res. 1998;32:119-26. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
16. Rahimtoola S, van Amerongen
E. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface
cavities. ASDC J Dent
Child. 2002;69:16-26,11.
PMID: 12119808 |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
17. van Gemert-Schriks MC, van Amerongen WE, ten Cate JM, Aartman IH. Three-year survival of single- and
two-surface ART restorations in a high-caries child population. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:337-43. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
18. Kemoli AM, van Amerongen
WE, Opinya G. Influence of the experience of
operator and assistant on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations:
two-year results. Eur Arch Paediatr
Dent. 2009;10:227-32. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
19. Frencken JE, Leal SC. The correct use of
the ART approach. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18:1-4. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
20. Kemoli AM, van Amerongen
WE. Influence of the cavity-size on the survival rate of proximal ART
restorations in primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009;19:423-30. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
21. da Franca C, Colares
V, Van Amerongen E. Two-year evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in primary
molars class I and II restorations. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011;21:249-53. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
22. Carvalho TS, Sampaio
FC, Diniz A, Bonecker M,
Van Amerongen WE. Two years survival rate of Class
II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva
contamination. Int J Paediatr
Dent. 2010;20:419-25. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
23. Kemoli AM, van Amerongen
WE. The dilemma of selecting suitable proximal carious lesions in primary
molars for restoration using ART technique. Community
Dent Health. 2011;28:12-6. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
24. Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Frencken JE, van't Hof M.
Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and
conventional cavity preparations in primary molars. Am J Dent. 2006;19:359-63. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
25. Topaloglu-Ak A, Eden E, Frencken JE, Oncag O. Two years
survival rate of class II composite resin restorations prepared by ART with
and without a chemomechanical caries removal gel in
primary molars. Clin Oral Investig.
2009;13:325-32. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
26. Fonseca RB, Branco
CA, Quagliatto PS, Goncalves
Lde S, Soares CJ, Carlo
HL, et al. Influence of powder/liquid ratio on the radiodensity
and diametral tensile strength of glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral
Sci. 2010;18:577-84. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
27. Kemoli AM, Opinya
GN, van Amerongen WE, Mwalili SM. Two-year survival rates of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment restorations in relation
to glass ionomer cements and Postrestoration
meals consumed. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33:246-51. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
28. Luo
Y, Wei SH, Fan MW, Lo EC. Clinical investigation of a
high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with
the ART technique in Wuhan, China: one-year results. Chin J Dent Res. 1999;2:73-8. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
29. Deepa G, Shobha
T. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer
cements in primary molars using atraumatic
restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010;20:410-8. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||