Montenegro-Santillán R, Alegre-Domingo T, Faus-Matoses V, Faus-Llácer V. An in vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper universal and GT series x files. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 May 1;18 (3):e533-6.

 

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.18595

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.18595

 

 

 

1. Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988;14:346-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1

 

2. Kazemi RB, Stenman E, Spangberg LS. A comparison of stainless steel and nickel titanium H-type instruments of identical design: torsional and bending tests. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90:500-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.108959
PMid:11027388

 

3. Ferraz CC, Gomes NV, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J. 2001;34:354-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00394.x
PMid:11482718

 

4. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod. 2000;26:161-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008
PMid:11199711

 

5. Glossen CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1995;21:146-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80441-3

 

6. Yared G. In vitro study of the torsional properties of new and used ProFile nickel titanium rotary files. J Endod. 2004;30:410-2.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200406000-00008
PMid:15167468

 

7. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1997;23:77-85.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80250-6

 

8. Iqbal MK, Kohli MR, Kim JS. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study. J Endod. 2006;32:1048-52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.03.001
PMid:17055904

 

9. Grande NM, Plotino G, Pecci R, Bedini R, Malagnino VA, Somma F. Cyclic fatigue resistance and three-dimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel-titanium rotary systems. Int Endod J. 2006;39:755-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01143.x
PMid:16948660

 

10. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, Powers JM, Nusstein JM, Daehn GS. SEM observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that fractured during clinical use. J Endod. 2005;31:40-3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000132301.87637.4A
PMid:15614004

 

11. Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J Endod. 2004;30:722-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129963.42882.C9
PMid:15448468

 

12. Kell T, Azarpazhooh A, Peters OA, El-Mowafy O, Tompson B, Basrani B. Torsional profiles of new and used 20/.06 GT series X and GT rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod. 2009;35:1278-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.05.005
PMid:19720231

 

13. Haïkel Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G, Senger B, Allemann C. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1999;25:434-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80274-X

 

14. Buchanan LS. The new GT Series X rotary shaping system: objectives and technique principles. Dent Today. 2008;27:70-74.
PMid:18240635

 

15. Ruddle CD. The Protaper technique: endodontics made easier. Dent Today. 2001; 20:58-64.
PMid:11715650

 

16. Kramkowski TR, Bahcall J. An in vitro comparison of torsional stress and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT Series X rotary nickel-titanium files. J Endod. 2009;35:404-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.003
PMid:19249605

 

17. Ounsi HF, Salameh Z, Al-Shalan T, Ferrari M, Grandini S, Pashley DH. Effect of clinical use on the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2007;33:737-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.03.006
PMid:17509417

 

18. Kitchens GG Jr, Liewehr FR, Moon PC. The effect of operational speed on the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2007;33:52-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.09.004
PMid:17185131

 

19. Lopes HP, Moreira EJ, Elias CN, de Almeida RA, Neves MS. Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper instruments. J Endod. 2007;33:55-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.09.003
PMid:17185132

 

20. Inan U, Aydin C, Tunca YM. Cyclic fatigue of ProTaper rotary nickel-titanium instruments in artificial canals with 2 different radii of curvature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:837-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.06.019
PMid:17904394

 

21. Larsen CM, Watanabe I, Glickman GN, He J. Cyclic fatigue analysis of new generation of nickel titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2009;35:401-3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.010
PMid:19249604

 

22. Al-Hadlaq SM, AlJarbou FA, AlThumairy RI. Evaluation of cyclic flexural fatigue of m-wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2010;36:305-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.032
PMid:20113796

 

23. Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma F, Garala M, De Luca M, et al. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod. 2008;34:1003-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.007
PMid:18634935

 

24. da Cunha Peixoto IF, Pereira ES, da Silva JG, Viana AC, Buono VT, Bahia MG. Flexural fatigue and torsional resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT Series X Instruments. J Endod. 2010;36:741-4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.016
PMid:20307756