Zamora N, Cibrián R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Jul 1;18 (4):e725-32. 

 

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.18919

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.18919

 

 

 

1. Oktay H. A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;99:122-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70114-C

 

2. Rotberg S, Fried N, Kane J, Shapiro E. Predicting the "Wits" appraisal from the ANB angle. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:636-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90155-4

 

3. Freeman RS. Adjusting ANB angles to reflect the effect of maxillary position. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:162-71.
PMid:6942667

 

4. Taylor CM. Changes in the relationship of nasion, point A, and point B and the effect upon ANB. Am J Orthod. 1969;56:143-63.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90231-0

 

5. Jacobson A. Application of the "Wits" appraisal. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:179-89.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(76)90318-3

 

6. Iwasaki H, Ishikawa H, Chowdhury L, Nakamura S, Iida J. Properties of the ANB angle and the Wits appraisal in the skeletal estimation of Angle's Class III patients. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:477-83.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/24.5.477
PMid:12407943

 

7. Bishara SE, Fahl JA, Peterson LC. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: clinical implications. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:133-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(83)90177-X

 

8. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:410-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/20987648
PMid:17082331

 

9. Moerenhout BA, Gelaude F, Swennen GR, Casselman JW, Van Der Sloten J, Mommaerts MY. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009;37:18-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2008.07.006
PMid:18815053

 

10. Lagravčre MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:112-16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.024
PMid:18617110

 

11. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher DC. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:80-93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/31349994
PMid:18239035

 

12. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:387-95.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/122106-52.1
PMid:18416632

 

13. Lamichane M, Anderson NK, Rigali PH, Seldin EB, Will LA. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:156-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.006
PMid:19651340

 

14. De Oliveira AE, Cevidanes LH, Phillips C, Motta A, Burke B, Tyndall D. Observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:256-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.039
PMid:18718796 PMCid:2642991

 

15. Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrián R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e678-88.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17721
PMid:22322503 PMCid:3476034

 

16.Van Vlijmen OJ, Maal T, Bergé SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:156-160.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.017
PMid:20044238

 

17.Yitschaky O, Redlich M, Abed Y, Faerman M, Casap N , Hiller N. Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:11–6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/031710-157.1
PMid:20936949

 

18. Nalçaci R, Oztürk F, Sökücü O. A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39:100-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/82724776
PMid:20100922 PMCid:3520203

 

19. Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrián R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:856-64.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2319/121210-717.1
PMid:21469969

 

20. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J of Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:609-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028
PMid:19464146

 

21. Hussels W, Nanda RS. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:411-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90162-3

 

22. Nanda RS. Growth changes in skeletal-facial profile and their significance in orthodontic diagnosis. Am J Orthod. 1971;59:501-13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(71)90085-6

 

23. Del Santo M. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:641-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.025
PMid:16679204

 

24. Jamison JE, Bishara SE, Peterson LC, DeKock WH, Kremenak CR. Longitudinal changes in the maxilla and the maxillary-mandibular relationship between 8 and 17 years of age. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:217-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90142-7