Román-Richon
S, Faus-Matoses V, Alegre-Domingo T, Faus-Llácer VJ. Radiographic technical quality of root canal treatment performed ex vivo
by dental students at Valencia University Medical and Dental School, Spain. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Jan 1;19 (1):e93-7.
doi:10.4317/medoral.19176
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.19176
|
1.
European Society of Endodontology. Quality
guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society
of Endodontology. Int Endod
J. 2006;39:921-30. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Ng YL,
Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey
J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal
treatment: systematic review of the literature. Part 2. Influence of clinical
factors. Int Endod J.
2008;41:6-31. |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Smith
CS, Setchell DJ, Harty
FJ. Factors influencing the success of conventional root canal therapy - a
five-year retrospective study. Int Endod J. 1993;26:321-33. |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Peak
JD, Hayes SJ, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. The outcome of
root canal treatment. A retrospective study within the armed forces (Royal
Air Force). Br Dent
J. 2001;190:140-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Eleftheriadis GI, Lambrianidis
TP. Technical quality of root canal treatment and detection of iatrogenic
errors in an undergraduate dental clinic. Int Endod J. 2005;38:725-34. |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Tsuneishi M, Yamamoto T, Yamanaka R, Tamaki N, Sakamoto
T, Tsuji K, et al. Radiographic evaluation of periapical
status and prevalence of endodontic treatment in an adult Japanese
population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005;100:631-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
7. Er O, Sagsen B, Maden M, Cinar S, Kahraman Y. Radiographic technical quality of root
fillings performed by dental students in Turkey. Int
Endod J. 2006;39:867-72. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
European Society of Endodontology. Undergraduate
curriculum guidelines for endodontology. Int Endod J. 2001;34:574-80. |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Moussa-Badran S, Roy B, Bessart
du Parc AS, Bruyant M, Lefevre B, Maurin JC. Technical
quality of root fillings performed by dental students at the dental teaching
centre in Reims, France. Int Endod
J. 2008;41:679-84. |
|
|
|
|
|
10. Barrieshi-Nusair KM, Al-Omari
MA, Al-Hiyasat AS. Radiographic technical quality
of root canal treatment performed by dental students at the Dental Teaching
Center in Jordan. J Dent.
2004;32:301-7. |
|
|
|
|
|
11. Landis
JR, Koch GG. The measurements of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-74. |
|
|
|
|
|
12. Saunders
MB, Gulabivala K, Holt R, Kahan
RS. Reliability of radiographic observations recorded on a proforma measured using inter- and intra-observer
variation: a preliminary study. Int Endod J. 2000;33: 272-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Saunders WP, Saunders EM, Sadiq J, Cruickshank E.
Technical standard of root canal treatment in an adult Scottish
sub-population. Br Dent J. 1997;182:382-6. |
|
|
|
|
|
14. De
Moor RJ, Hommez GM, De Boever
JG, Delmé KI, Martens GE. Periapical
health related to the quality of root canal treatment in a Belgian
population. Int Endod J.
2000;33:113-20. |
|
|
|
|
|
15. Loftus
JJ, Keating AP, McCartan BE. Periapical
status and quality of endodontic treatment in an adult Irish population. Int Endod J. 2005;38:81-6. |
|
|
|
|
|
16. Qualtrough AJ, Dummer PM.
Undergraduate endodontic teaching in the United Kingdom: an update. Int Endod J. 1997;30:234-9. |
|
|
|
|
|
17. Hayes
SJ, Gibson M, Hammond M, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. An
audit of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students. Int Endod J. 2001;34:501-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
18. Lynch
CD, Burke FM. Quality of root canal fillings performed by undergraduate
dental students on single-rooted teeth. Eur J Dent
Educ. 2006;10:67-72. |
|
|
|
|
|
19. Qualtrough AJ, Whitworth JM, Dummer
PM. Preclinical endodontology: an international
comparison. Int Endod J.
1999;32:406-14. |
|
|
|
|
|
20. Glossen CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison
of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic
instruments. J Endod.
1995;21:146-51. |
|
|
|
|
|
21. Schäfer E, Florek H. Efficiency
of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand
K-Flexofile. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated
curved canals. Int Endod
J. 2003;36:199-207. |
|
|
|
|
|
22. Schäfer E, Schlingemann R.
Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless
steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness
and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endod J. 2003;36:208-17. |
|
|
|
|
|
23. Schäfer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel
titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. Int Endod
J. 2004;30:432-5. |
|
|
|
|
|
24. Liu
SB, Fan B, Cheung GS, Peng
B, Fan MW, Gutmann JL, et al. Cleaning effectiveness and
shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with
rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile. Am J Dent. 2006;19:353-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
25. Guelzow A, Stamm O, Martus P, Kielbassa
AM. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand
instrumentation for root canal preparation. Int Endod J. 2005;38:743-52. |
|
|
|
|
|
26.
Sonntag D, Delschen S, Stachniss
V. Root-canal shaping with manual and rotary Ni-Ti files performed by
students. Int Endod J.
2003;36:715-23. |
|
|
|
|
|
27. Georgelin-Gurgel M, Devillard
R, Lauret ME, Diemer F, Calas P, Hennequin M. Root
canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical teaching. Odonstomatol Trop. 2008;31:5-11. |
|