Pereira-Maciel P, Tavares-de-Sousa E, Oliveira-Sales MA. The mandibular incisive canal and its anatomical relationships: A cone beam computed tomography study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Nov 1;20 (6):e723-8.  

 

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.20644

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.20644

 

 

1. Polland KE, Munro S, Reford G, Lockhart A, Logan G, Brocklebank L, et al. The Mandibular Canal of the Edentulous Jaw. Clinical Anatomy. 2001;14:445-52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.1080

 

2. De Andrade E, Otomo-Corgel J, Pucher J, Ranganath KA, St George N. The intraosseous course of the mandibular incisive nerve in the mandibular symphysis. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2001;21:591-7.

 

3. Uchida Y, Noguchi N, Goto M, Yamashita Y, Hanihara T, Takamori H, et al. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: Second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009;67:744-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.05.352

 

4. Tepper G, Hofschneider UB, Gahleitner A, Ulm C. Computed tomographic diagnosis and localization of bone canals in the mandibular interforaminal regions for prevention of bleeding complications during implant surgery. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2001;16:68-72.

 

5. Jacobs R, Mraiwa N, vanSteenberghe D, Gijbels F, Quirynen M. Appearance, location, course, and morphology of the mandibular incisive canal: an assessment on spiral CT scan. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2002;31:322-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600719

 

6. Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Moerman P, Lambrichts I, vanSteenberghe D, Quirynen M. Presence and course of the incisive canal in the human mandibular interforaminal region: two-dimensional imaging versus anatomical observations. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2003;25:416-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00276-003-0152-8

 

7. Makris N, Stamatakis H, Syriopoulos K, Tsiklakis K, Van derStelt PF. Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2010;21: 766-71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01903.x

 

8. Pires CA, Bissada NF, Becker JJ, Kanawati A, Landers MA. Mandibular Incisive Canal: Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2012;14:67-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00228.x

 

9. Rosa MB, Sotto-Maior BS, Machado VC, Francischone CE. Retrospective study of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve and the incisive canal using cone beam computed tomography. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2013;28:388-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2648

 

10. Mardinger O, Chaushu G, Arensburg B, Taicher S, Kaffe I. Anatomic and radiologic course of the mandibular incisive canal. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2000;22:157-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00276-000-0157-5

 

11. KŸtŸk N, Demirbaz AE, Gšnen ZB, Topan C, Kili E, Etš OA, et al. Anterior Mandibular Zone Safe for Implants. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2013;24: e405-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318292c7d5

 

12. Wismeijer D, van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI, Kalk W. Patients' perception of sensory disturbances of the mental nerve before and after implant surgery: a prospective study of 110 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;35:254-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0266-4356(97)90043-7

 

13. Apostolakis D, Brown JE. The anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve: prevalence, measurement of its length and a recommendation for interforaminal implant installation based on cone beam CT imaging. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2012;23:1022-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02261.x

 

14. Sokhn S, Nasseh I, Noujeim M. Using cone beam computed tomography to determine safe regions for implant placement. General Dentistry. 2011;59:e72-7.

 

15. Von Arx T, HŠfliger J, Chappuis V. Neurosensory disturbances following bone harvesting in the symphysis: a prospective clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2005;16:432-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01138.x

 

16. Oliveira-Santos C, Souza PHC, Berti-Couto AS, Stinkens L, Moyaert K, Rubira-Bullen IRF, et al. Assessment of variations of the mandibular canal through cone beam computed tomography. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2012;16:387-93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0544-9

 

17. Sahman H, Sekerci AE, Sisman Y, Payveren M. Assessment of the visibility and characteristics of the mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography versus panoramic radiography. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2014;29:71-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3304

 

18. Santos T, Gomes AA, Melo DG, Melo AR, Cavalcante JR, Araœjo LG, et al. Evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of linear measurements of cone-beam-computed tomography. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2012;23:473-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.104952

 

19. Kamburoglu K, Kõlõ C, …zen T, YŸksel SP. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by conebeam computed tomography: a cadaveric study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2009;107:e34-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.10.012

 

20. Parnia F, Moslehifard E, Hafezeqoran A, Mahboub F, Mojaver-Kahnamoui H. Characteristics of anatomical landmarks in the mandibular interforaminal region: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2012;17:e420-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17520

 

21. Romanos GE, Papadimitriou DEV, Royer K, Stefanova-Stephens N, Salwan R, Malmstršm H, et al. The presence of the mandibular incisive canal: A panoramic radiographic examination. Implant Dentistry. 2012;21:202-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31824bc4c4

 

22. Jacobs R, Mraiwa N, vanSteenberghe D, Sanderink G, Quirynen M. Appearance of the mandibular incisive canal on panoramic radiographs. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2004;26:329-33.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00276-004-0242-2

 

23.KŸtŸk N, Demirbaş AE, Gšnen ZB, Topan C, Kili E, Etšz OA, et al. Anterior mandibular zone safe for implants. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24:e405-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318292c7d5

 

24. Cantekin K, Sekerci AE, Miloglu O, Buyuk SK. Identification of the mandibular landmarks in a pediatric population. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2013;19:e136-41.

 

25. Al-Ani O, Nambiar P, Ha KO, Ngeow WC. Safe zone for bone harvesting from the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24 Suppl A100:115-21.

 

26. Apostolakis D, Brown JE. The dimensions of the mandibular incisive canal and its spatial relationship to various anatomical landmarks of the mandible: a study using cone beam computed tomography. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2013;28:117-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2372

 

27. Huang H, Liu P, Li X, Pei Z, Yang X, Bai S, et al. Mandibular incisive canal by cone beam CT. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013;31:479-82.

 

28. Uchida Y, Yamashita Y, Goto M, Hanihara T. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2007;67:744-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.05.352