Burgue–o-Barris G, CortŽs-Acha B, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castell—n E. Aesthetic perception of single implants placed in the anterior zone. A cross-sectional study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016 Jul 1;21 (4):e488-93. 

 

 

doi:10.4317/medoral.21155

http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.21155

 

 

1. Belser UC, GrŸtter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2-to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009;80:140-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435

 

2. Hof M, Pommer B, Strbac GD, SŸtš D, Watzek G, Zechner W. Esthetic evaluation of single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla following autologous bone augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:88-93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02381.x

 

3. Kourkouta S, Dedi KD, Paquette DW, Mol A. Interproximal tissue dimensions in relation to adjacent implants in the anterior maxilla: clinical observations and patient aesthetic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1375-85.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01761.x

 

4. Suphanantachat S, Thovanich K, Nisapakultorn K. The influence of peri-implant mucosal level on the satisfaction with anterior maxillary implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:1075-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02268.x

 

5. Chang M, Odman PA, Wennstršm JL, Andersson B. Esthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth replacements assessed by the patient and by prosthodontists. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12:335-41.

 

6. Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, BŸrgin W, BrŠgger U, Lang NP. Patient's satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:185-93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01094.x

 

7. Hartlev J, Kohberg P, Ahlmann S, Andersen NT, Schou S, Isidor F. Patient satisfaction and esthetic outcome after immediate placement and provisionalization of single-tooth implants involving a definitive individual abutment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:1245-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12260

 

8. Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Dierens M, De Rouck T. Single implant treatment in healing versus sites of the anterior maxilla: an aesthetic evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:517-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00300.x

 

9. Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Collys K, Cleymaet R, De Rouck T. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-yearrsults of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:746-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01748.x

 

10. Raes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Clinical, aesthetic, and patient-related outcome of immediately loaded single implants in the anterior maxilla: a prospective study in extraction sockets, healed ridges, and grafted sites. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15:819-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00438.x

 

11. den Hartog L, Raghoebar GM, Slater JJ, Stellingsma K, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Single-tooth implants with different neck designs: a randomized clinical trial evaluating the aesthetic outcome. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15:311-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00372.x

 

12. Cho HL, Lee JK, Um HS, Chang BS. Esthetic evaluation of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010;40:188-93.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.4.188

 

13. Cosyn J, Eghbali A, Hanselaer L, De Rouck T, Wyn I, Sabzevar MM, et al. Four modalities of single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: a clinical, radiographic, and aesthetic evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15:517-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00417.x

 

14. Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997;17:326-33.

 

15. Palmer RM, Farkhondeh N, Palmer PJ, Wilson RF. Astra Tech single-tooth implants: an audit of patient satisfaction and soft tissue form. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34:633-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01101.x

 

16. Baracat LF, Teixeira AM, dos Santos MB, da Cunha Vde P, Marchini L. Patient's expectations before and evaluation after dental implant therapy. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:141-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00191.x

 

17. Hosseini M, Gotfredsen K. A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:453-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02162.x

 

18. Meijndert L, Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM. Evaluation of aesthetics of implant-supported single-tooth replacements using different bone augmentation procedures: a prospective randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:715-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01415.x

 

19. Annibali S, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Cristalli MP. Usefulness of the aesthetic result as a success criterion for implant therapy: a review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:3-40.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00234.x

 

20. Benic GI, Wolleb K, Sancho-Puchades M, HŠmmerle CH. Systematic review of parameters and methods for the professional assessment of aesthetics in dental implant research. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39:160-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01840.x

 

21. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:1-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1

 

22. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG. Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175-91.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

 

23. Kokich VO, Kokich VG, Kiyak HA. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:141-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.017

 

24. Thomas M, Reddy R, Reddy BJ. Perception differences of altered dental esthetics by dental professionals and laypersons. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22:242-7.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.84295

 

25. Kumar S, Gandhi S, Valiathan A. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23:295.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.100456

 

26. LaVacca MI, Tarnow DP, Cisneros GJ. Interdental papilla lenght and the perception of aesthetics. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2005;17:405-12.

 

27. Chang M, Wennstršm JL, Odman P, Andersson B. Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared to contralateral natural teeth. Crown and soft tissue dimensions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:185-94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100301.x

 

28. Vilhj‡lmsson VH, Klock KS, St¿rksen K, BŒrdsen A. Aesthetics of implant-supported single anterior maxillary crowns evaluated by objective indices and participant's perceptions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1399-403.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02128.x

 

29. Gotfredsen K. A 5-year prospective study of single-tooth replacements supported by the Astra Tech implant: a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6:1-8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00021.x