Al-Shayyab MH, Qabba’ah K, Alsoleihat F, Baqain ZH. Age and gender variations in the cone-beam computed tomographic location of mandibular canal: Implications for mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Jul 1;24 (4):e545-54.
doi:10.4317/medoral.22969
http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.22969
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
References
|
1. Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL,
Beinemann J, Juergens P. Evaluation of risk of injury to the inferior
alveolar nerve with classical sagittal split osteotomy technique and proposed
alternative surgical techniques using computer-assisted surgery. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:79-86. |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
2. R. Trauner and H.
Obwegeser. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia
with consideration of genioplasty-part I: surgical procedures to correct
mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.
1957;10:677-89. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
3. Monson LA: Bilateral
sagittal split osteotomy. Semin Plast Surg. 2013;27:145-8. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
4. Verweij JP, Houppermans
PN, Gooris P, Mensink G, van Merkesteyn JR. Risk factors for common
complications associated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: A
literature review and meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;
44:1170-80. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
5. Panula K, Finne K,
Oikarinen K. Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic
surgery: a review of 655 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59:1128-36. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
6. Cillo JE, Stella JP.
Selection of sagittal split ramus osteotomy technique based on skeletal
anatomy and planned distal segment movement: current therapy. J Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 2005;63:109-14. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
7.
Scomparin L, Soares MQ, Rubira CM, Yaedú RY, Imada TS, Centurion BS, et al. CBCT location of the fusion between the buccal and
lingual cortical in the mandibular ramus: importance to sagittal split
osteotomy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;22:500-5. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
8.
Al-Shayyab MH. A simple method to locate mandibular foramen with cone-beam
computed tomography and its relevance to oral and maxillofacial surgery: a
radio-anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018;40:625-34. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
9.
Bhardwaj D, Kumar JS, Mohan V. Radiographic evaluation of mandible to predict
the gender and age. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:ZC66-9. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
10.
Yu IH, Wong YK. Evaluation of mandibular anatomy related to sagittal split
ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional computed to¬mography scan images. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37:521-8. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
11.
Sekerci AE, Sahman H. Cone beam computed tomographic analyses of the position
and course of the mandibular canal: relevance to the sagittal split ramus
osteotomy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
12.
Huang CY, Liao YF. Anatomical position of the mandibular canal in relation to
the buccal cortical bone in Chinese patients with different dentofacial
relationships. J Formos Med Assoc. 2016;115:981-91. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
13.
Noleto JW, Marchiori E, Da Silveira HM. Evaluation of mandibular ramus
morphology using computed tomography in patients with mandibular prognathism and
retrognathia: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68:1788-94. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
14.
Tsuji Y, Muto T, Kawakami J, Takeda S. Computed tomographic analysis of the
position and course of the mandibular canal: relevance to the sagittal split
ramus osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 34:243-6. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
15.
Hur MS, Kim HC, Won SY, Hu KS, Song WC, Koh KS, et al. Topography and spatial
fascicular arrangement of the human inferior alveolar nerve. Clin Implant Dent
Relat Res. 2013;15:88-95. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
16.
Angelopoulos C, Thomas S, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek M. Comparison
between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for
the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental
implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:2130-5. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
17.
Hassan BA, Payam J, Juyanda B, Van der Stelt P, Wesselink PR. Influence of
scan setting selections on root canal visibility with cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac
Radiol. 2012;41:645-8. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
18.
de Santana Santos T, Gomes AC, de Melo DG, Melo AR, Cavalcante JR, de Araújo
LC, et al. Evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of linear
measurements of cone-beam-computed tomography. Indian J Dent Res.
2012;23:473-8. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
19.
Sairam V, Geethamalika MV, Kumar PB, Naresh G, Raju GP. Determination of
sexual dimorphism in humans by measurements of mandible on digital panoramic
radiograph. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016;7:434-9. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
20. Ashkenazi M, Taubman L,
Gavish A. Age associated changes of the mandibular foramen position in anteroposterior
dimension and of the mandibular angle in dry human mandibles. Anat Rec.
2011;294:1319-25. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
21. Kanno CM, de Oliveira JA, Cannon M, Carvalho AA. The mandibular lingula's position in children as a reference to inferior alveolar nerve block. J Dent Child. 2005;72:56-60. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
22. Aarabi M, Tabrizi R,
Hekmat M, Shahidi S, Puzesh A. Relation¬ship between mandibular anatomy and
the occurrence of a bad split upon sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac
Surg. 2014;72:2508-13. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
23. Witherow H, Offord D,
Eliahoo J, Stewart A. Postoperative frac¬tures of the lingual plate after
bilateral sagittal split osteotomies. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
2006;44:296-300. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
24. Chen JC, Lin LM, Geist
JR, Chen JY, Chen CH, Chen YK. A retrospective comparison of the location and
diameter of the inferior alveolar canal at the mental foramen and length of
the anterior loop between American and Taiwanese cohorts using CBCT. Surg Radiol Anat.
2013;35:11-6. |
||||