Rizzo-Lorenzo A, Sánchez-Torres A, Noguera-Mutlló C, Pérez-Beltrán I, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E. Influence of information concerning a computerized anesthesia system on dental anxiety: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 Mar 1;25 (2):e217-23.



doi:10.4317/medoral.23315

https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.23315

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Hochman M, Chiarello D, Hochman CB, Lopatkin R, Pergola S. Computerized local anesthetic delivery vs. traditional syringe technique. Subjective pain response. N Y State Dent J. 1997;63:24-9.

PMid:9297957

2. Saloum FS, Baumgartner JC, Marshall G, Tinkle J. A clinical comparison of pain perception to the Wand and a traditional syringe. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;89:691-5.

https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.106333

PMid:10846122 

3. Gibson RS, Allen K, Hutfless S, Beiraghi S. The Wand vs. traditional injection: a comparison of pain related behaviors. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:458-62.

PMid:11132503

4. Kuscu OO, Akyuz S. Is it the injection device or the anxiety experienced that causes pain during dental local anaesthesia? Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:139-45.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00875.x

PMid:18237297 

5. Shah M, Shivaswamy S, Jain S, Tambwekar S. A clinical comparison of pain perception and extent of area anesthetized by Wand® and a traditional syringe. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012;16:207-12.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.99263

PMid:23055586 PMCid:PMC3459500

6. Kudo M. Initial injection pressure for dental local anesthesia: effects on pain and anxiety. Anesth Prog. 2005;52:95-101.

https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006(2005)52[95:IIPFDL]2.0.CO;2

PMid:16252739

7. Sumer M, Misir F, Koyuturk AE. Comparison of the Wand with a conventional technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:106-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.002

PMid:16731373 

8. Versloot J, Veerkamp JS, Hoogstraten J. Pain behavior and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerized anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe. Br Dent J. 2008;205:E2.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.414

PMid:18493254 

9. Versloot J, Veerkamp JS, Hoogstraten J. Computerized anaesthesia delivery system vs. traditional syringe: comparing pain and pain-related behavior in children. Our J Oral Sci. 2005;113:488-93.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00252.x

PMid:16324138 

10. Goodell GG, Gallagher FJ, Nicoll BK. Comparison of a controlled injection pressure system with a conventional technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000;90:88-94.

https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.107365

PMid:10884642 

11. Loomer PM, Perry DA. Computer-controlled delivery versus syringe delivery of local anesthetic injections for therapeutic scaling and root planning. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:358-65.

https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0188

PMid:15058627 

12. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Group. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:1-37.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004

PMid:20346624 

13. Pell GJ, Gregory BT. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified techniques for removal. Dent Digest. 1933;39:330-8.

14. Winter GB. Principles of exodontia as applied to the impacted third molar. St Louis, American Medical Books. 1926.

15. Parant M. Petite chirurgie de la bouche. Paris, Expansion Cientifique. 1974.

16. Heaton LJ, Leroux BG, Ruff PA, Coldwell SE. Computerized dental injection fear treatment: a randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2013;92:37-42.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513484330

PMid:23690352 PMCid:PMC3706180

17. Romero-Galvez J, Berini-Aytés L, Figueiredo R, Arnabat-Dominguez J. A randomized split-mouth clinical trial comparing pain experienced during palatal injections with traditional syringe versus controlled-flow delivery Calaject technique. Quintessence Int. 2016;47:797-802.

PMid:27446999

18. Balaguer-Martí JC, Aloy-Prósper A, Peñarrocha-Oltra A, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Non surgical predicting factors for patient satisfaction after third molar surgery. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21:201-5.

https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20719

PMid:26827054 PMCid:PMC4788800

19. Kwak EJ, Pang NS, Cho JH, Jung BY, Kim KD, Park W. Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery for painless anesthesia: a literature review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2016;16:81-8.

https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2016.16.2.81

PMid:28879299 PMCid:PMC5564086

20. Wang MC, Vinall-Collier K, Csikar J, Douglas G. A qualitative study of patients' views of techniques to reduce dental anxiety. J Dent. 2017;66:45-51.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.08.012

PMid:28863963 

21. Patini R, Staderini E, Cantiani M, Camodeca A, Guglielmi F, Gallenzi P. Dental anaesthesia for children - effects of a computer-controlled delivery system on pain and heart rate: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56:744-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.08.006

PMid:30143396 

22. Re D, Del Fabbro M, Karanxha L, Augusti G, Augusti D, Fessi S, et al. Minimally-invasive dental anesthesia: Patients' preferences and analysis of the willingness-to-pay index. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018;9.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12275

PMid:28544653