Silva LdF, Reis ENRdC, Bonardi JP, Lima VNd, Aranega AM, D Ponzoni. Influence of surgical ultrasound used in the detachment of flaps, osteotomy and odontosection in lower third molar surgeries. A prospective, randomized, and “split-mouth” clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 Jul 1;25 (4):e461-7.


doi:10.4317/medoral.23447

https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.23447


1. Kirtiloğlu T, Bulut E, Sümer M, Cengiz I. Comparison of 2 flap designs in the periodontal healing of second molars after fully impacted mandibular third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:2206-10.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.029

PMid:17954315 

2. Steed MB. The indications for third-molar extractions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;145:570-3.

https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2014.18

PMid:24878712 

3. Rosa AL, Carneiro MG, Lavrador MA, Novaes AB Jr. Influence of flap design on periodontal healing of second molars after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:404-7.

https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.122823

PMid:12029279 

4. Pavlíková G, Foltán R, Horká M, Hanzelka T, Borunská H, Sedý J. Piezosurgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:451-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.11.013

PMid:21176870 

5. Birkenfeld F, Becker ME, Harder S, Lucius R, Kern M. Increased intraosseous temperature caused by ultrasonic devices during bone surgery and the influences of working pressure and cooling irrigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:1382-8.

PMID: 23189287

6. Guillaume B, Gaudin C, Georgeault S, Mallet R, Basle MF, Chappard D. Viability of osteocytes in bone autografts harvested for dental implantology. Biomed Mater. 2009;4:015012.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/4/1/015012

PMid:19075364 

7. Labanca M, Azzola F, Vinci R, Rodella LF. Piezoelectric surgery: Twenty years of use. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:265-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.12.007

PMid:18342999 

8. Rahnama M, Czupkałło L, Czajkowski L, Grasza J, Wallner J. The use of piezosurgery as an alternative method of minimally invasive surgery in the authors' experience. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2013;8:321-6.

https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2011.35144

PMid:24501602 PMCid:PMC3908639

9. Goyal M, Marya K, Jhamb A, Chawla S, Sonoo PR, Singh V, et al. Comparative evaluation of surgical outcome after removal of impacted mandibular third molars using a Piezotome or a conventional handpiece: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50:556-61.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.10.010

PMid:22088359 

10. Piersanti L, Dilorenzo M, Monaco G, Marchetti C. Piezosurgery or conventional rotatory instruments for inferior third molar extractions?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:1647-52.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.04.032

PMid:25109581 

11. Rullo R, Addabbo F, Papaccio G, D'Aquino R, Festa VM. Piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery: relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain with histological evaluations. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41:33-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.007

PMid:22890087 

12. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. World Medical Association. JAMA. 2013;310:2191-4. doi:0.1001/jama.2013.281053.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

PMid:24141714 

13. Lima CJ, Silva LC, Melo MR, Santos JA, Santos TS. Evaluation of the agreement by examiners according to classifications of third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:281-6.

https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17483

PMid:22143711 PMCid:PMC3448327

14. Sandhu A, Sandhu S, Kaur T. Comparison of two different flap designs in the surgical removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:1091-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.07.003

PMid:20727713 

15. Al-Moraissi EA, Elmansi YA, Al-Sharaee YA, Alrmali AE, Alkhutari AS. Does the piezoelectric surgical technique produce fewer postoperative sequelae after lower third molar surgery than conventional rotary instruments?. A systematic review and meta analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45:383-91.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.005

PMid:26572830 

16. Magesty RA, Galvão EL, de Castro Martins C, Dos Santos CRR, Falci SGM. Rotary instrument or piezoelectric for the removal of third molars: a meta-analysis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2017;16:13-21.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-016-0938-y

PMid:28286381 PMCid:PMC5328876

17. Keyhan SO, Fallahi HR, Cheshmi B, Mokhtari S, Zandian D, Yousefi P. Use of piezoelectric surgery and Er:YAG laser:which one is more effective during impacted third molar surgery?. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;41:29.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0212-6

PMid:31448247 PMCid:PMC6682838

18. Patil C, Jadhav A, K R, Bhola N, Borle RM, Mishra A."Piezosurgery vs bur in impacted mandibular third molar surgery: Evaluation of postoperative sequelae". J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019;9:259-62.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.06.007

PMid:31249772 PMCid:PMC6587023

19. Menziletoglu D, Basturk F, Isik BK, Esen A. A prospective split-mouth clinical study: comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;24:51-5.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-019-00817-7

PMid:31811604 

20. de Freitas Silva L, Ribeiro de Carvalho Reis EN, Oliveira Souza BC, Egas LS, Aranega AM, Ponzoni D. Alveolar repair after the use of piezosurgery in the removal of lower third molars: a prospective clinical, randomised, double-blind, split-mouth study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;57:1068-73.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.09.017

PMid:31607400