1. Paula-Silva FWG, Wu MK, Leonardo MR, Bezerra da Silva LA, Wesselink PR. Accuracy of Periapical Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans in Diagnosing Apical Periodontitis Using Histopathological Findings as a Gold Standard. J Endod. 2009;35:1009-12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.006

PMid:19567324 

2. Schloss T, Sonntag D, Kohli MR, Setzer FC. A Comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional Healing Assessment after Endodontic Surgery Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Volumes or Periapical Radiographs. J Endod. 2017;43:1072-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.02.007

PMid:28527841 

3. Del Fabbro M, Corbella S, Sequeira-Byron P, Tsesis I, Rosen E, Lolato A, et al. Endodontic procedures for retreatment of periapical lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:CD005511.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005511.pub3

PMid:27759881 PMCid:PMC6461161

4. Ma X, Li C, Jia L, Wang Y, Liu W, Zhou X, et al. Materials for retrograde filling in root channel therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD005517.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005517.pub2

PMid:7991646 PMCid:PMC6463971

5. Baek SH, Lee WC, Setzer FC, Kim S. Periapical bone regeneration after endodontic microsurgery with three different root-end filling materials: Amalgam, SuperEBA, and mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2010;36:1323-5.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.008

PMid:20647089 

6. Wälivaara DÅ, Abrahamsson P, Fogelin M, Isaksson S. Super-EBA and IRM as root-end fillings in periapical surgery with ultrasonic preparation: A prospective randomized clinical study of 206 consecutive teeth. Oral Surg, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2011;112:258-63.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.016

PMid:21458326 

7. Lui JN, Khin MM, Krishnaswamy G, Chen NN. Prognostic factors relating to the outcome of endodontic microsurgery. J Endod. 2014;40:1071-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.005

PMid:25069910 

8. Von Arx T, Peñarrocha M, Jensen S. Prognostic factors in apical surgery with root-end filling: A meta-analysis. J Endod. 2010;36:957-73.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.026

PMid:20478447 

9. Chong BS, Pitt Ford TR, Hudson MB. A prospective clinical study of MTA and IRM when used as root-end filling materials in endodontic surgery. Int Endod J. 2003;36:520-6.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00682.x

PMid:12887380 

10. Taschieri S, del Fabbro M, Testori T, et al. Endodontic surgery using 2 different magnification devices: preliminary results of a randomized controlled study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:235-42.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.033

PMid:16413895 

11. López-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F. The quality of internet information about oral leukoplakia. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Oral. 2010;15:e727-31.

https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.15.e727

PMid:20383096 

12. Zahedi R, Taheri B, Shahrzadi L, Tazhibi M, Ashrafi-Rizi H. Quality of persian addiction websites: A survey based on silberg, discerning and WQET instruments (2011). Acta Inform Medica. 2013;21:46-50.

https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2012.21.46-50

PMid:23572862 PMCid:PMC3610591

13. Kaicker J, Debono VB, Dang W, Buckley N, Thabane L. Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument. BMC Med. 2010;8:59.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-59

PMid:20939875 PMCid:PMC2967493

14. Varela-Centelles P, Insua A, Seoane-Romero JM, Warnakulasuriya S, Rapidis A, Diz P, et al. Available web-based teaching resources for health care professionals on screening for oral cancer. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Oral. 2015;20:e144-9.

https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20163

PMid:25475775 PMCid:PMC4393975

15. Riordain RN, Hodgson T. Content and quality of website information on the treatment of oral ulcers. Br Dent J. 2014;217:E15.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.886

PMid:25303608 

16. López-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F. The quality of patient-orientated Internet information on oral lichen planus: A pilot study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16:883-6.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01206.x

PMid:20586847 

17. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. JAMA. 1997;277:1244-5.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039

PMid:9103351 

18. Schwendicke F, Stange J, Stange C, Graetz C. German dentists' websites on periodontitis have low quality of information. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17:1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0511-8

PMid:28768511 PMCid:PMC5541403

19. Jayaratne YSN, Anderson NK, Zwahlen RA. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:1319-24.

https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12285

PMid:24148074 

20. Grewal P, Alagaratnam S. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet. Int J Surg. 2013;11:410-3.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.03.006

PMid:23523948 

21. Wiriyakijja P, Fedele S, Porter S, Ni Riordain R. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability. J Oral Pathol Med. 2016;45:617-20.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12459

PMid:27233229 

22. McCool ME, Wahl J, Schlecht I, Apfelbacher C. Evaluating written patient information for eczema in German: Comparing the reliability of two instruments, DISCERN and EQIP. PLoS One. 2015;10:1-9.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139895

PMid:26440612 PMCid:PMC4595422

23. Moult B, Franck LS, Brady H. Ensuring quality information for patients: development and preliminary validation of a new instrument to improve the quality of written health care information. Heal Expect. 2004;7:165-75.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00273.x

PMid:15117391 PMCid:PMC5060233

24. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R, Charnock D, Shepperd S, et al. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:105-11.

https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.2.105

PMid:10396471 PMCid:PMC1756830

25. Aslam R, Gibbons D, Ghezzi P. Online Information on Antioxidants: Information Quality Indicators, Commercial Interests, and Ranking by Google. Front Public Health. 2017;5:90.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00090

PMid:28484695 PMCid:PMC5399021

26. Hu X, Pan H, He W, Hua H, Yan Z. Evaluation of the content quality of websites for recurrent aphthous ulcers and oral lichen planus. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:1-7.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0467-1

PMid:29284468 PMCid:PMC5747117

27. Diniz-Freitas M, Insua A, Keat R, Fricain JC, Catros S, Monteiro L, Silva L, Lodi L, Pispero A, Albuquerque R. Web-Based Information on the Treatment of Tobacco Dependence for Oral Health Professionals: Analysis of English-Written Websites. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2017;19:e349.

https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8174

PMid:29054831 PMCid:PMC5670309

28. López-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F. The quality of internet sites providing information relating to oral cancer. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:e95-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.017

PMid:19457707 

29. Jo JH, Kim EJ, Kim JR, Kim MJ, Chung JW, Park JW. Quality and readability of internet-based information on halitosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;125:215-22.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2017.12.001

PMid:29325852