1. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1887-92.

https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200006223422507

PMid:10861325 PMCid:PMC1557642

2. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman DG, et al. CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e20.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050020

PMid:18215107 PMCid:PMC2211558

3. Faggion CJ, Giannakopoulos NN. Quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading journals of periodontology and implant dentistry: a survey. J Periodontol. 2012;83:1251-6.

https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.110609

PMid:22220771 

4. Chhapola V, Tiwari S, Brar R, Kanwal SK. Reporting quality of trial abstracts-improved yet suboptimal: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med. 2018;2:89-94.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12294

PMid:29460397 

5. Hua F, Deng L, Kau CH, Jiang H, He H, Walsh T. Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts: survey of leading general dental journals. J Am Dent Assoc. 2015;146:669-78.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2015.03.020

PMid:26314976 

6. Needleman I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moles DR, Worthington H. Improving the clarity and transparency of reporting health research: a shared obligation and responsibility. J Dent Res. 2008;87:894-5.

https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808701013

PMid:18809741 

7. Leow NM, Hussain Z, Petrie A, Donos N, Needleman IG. Has the quality of reporting in periodontology changed in 14 years? A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43:833-8.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12572

PMid:27136048 

8. Kumar S, Mohammad H, Vora H, Kar K. Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Periodontal Diseases in Journal Abstracts-A Cross-sectional Survey and Bibliometric Analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018;18:130-41.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.08.005

PMid:29747793 

9. Monsarrat P, Blaizot A, Kemoun P, Ravaud P, Nabet C, Sixou M, et al. Clinical research activity in periodontal medicine: a systematic mapping of trial registers. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43:390-400.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12534

PMid:26881700 

10. Fleming PS, Buckley N, Seehra J, Polychronopoulou A, Pandis N. Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 2011. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:451-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.013

PMid:22999667 

11. Seehra J, Wright NS, Polychronopoulou A, Cobourne MT, Pandis N. Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in dental specialty journals. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2013;13:1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2012.11.001

PMid:23481004 

12. Kiriakou J, Pandis N, Madianos P, Polychronopoulou A. Assessing the reporting quality in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in leading journals of oral implantology. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2014;14:9-15.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2013.10.018

PMid:24581704 

13. Jin L, Hua F, Cao Q. Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts published in leading laser medicine journals: an assessment using the CONSORT for abstracts guidelines. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31:1583-90.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-2018-4

PMid:27365107 

14. Ghimire S, Kyung E, Lee H, Kim E. Oncology trial abstracts showed suboptimal improvement in reporting: a comparative before-and-after evaluation using CONSORT for Abstract guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:658-66.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.012

PMid:24439069 

15. Cui Q, Tian J, Song X, Yang K. Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways? J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20:827-33.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12200

PMid:24916891 

16. Lucena C, Souza EM, Voine GC, Pulgar R, Valderrama MJ, De-Deus G. A quality assessment of randomized controlled trial reports in endodontics. Int Endod J. 2017;50:237-50.

https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12626

PMid:26932828 

17. Hrobjartsson A, Emanuelsson F, Skou TA, Hilden J, Brorson S. Bias due to lack of patient blinding in clinical trials. A systematic review of trials randomizing patients to blind and nonblind sub-studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43:1272-83.

https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu115

PMid:24881045 PMCid:PMC4258786

18. Hrobjartsson A, Thomsen AS, Emanuelsson F, Tendal B, Hilden J, Boutron I, et al. Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors. BMJ. 2012;344:e1119.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e1119

PMid:22371859 

19. Walsh M, Srinathan SK, McAuley DF, Mrkobrada M, Levine O, Ribic C, et al. The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:622-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019

PMid:24508144 

20. Buas MF, Li CI, Anderson GL, Pepe MS. Recommendation to use exact P-values in biomarker discovery research in place of approximate P-values. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018;56:83-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2018.07.014

PMid:30099328 PMCid:PMC6279233

21. Tijdink JK, Smulders YM, Bouter LM, Vinkers CH. The effects of industry funding and positive outcomes in the interpretation of clinical trial results: a randomized trial among Dutch psychiatrists. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20:64.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0405-7

PMid:31533704 PMCid:PMC6749641

22. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326:1167-70.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167

PMid:12775614 PMCid:PMC156458

23. Bero L, Oostvogel F, Bacchetti P, Lee K. Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: why some statins appear more efficacious than others. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e184.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040184

PMid:17550302 PMCid:PMC1885451

24. Song SY, Kim B, Kim I, Kim S, Kwon M, Han C, et al. Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12:e187807.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187807

PMid:29117269 PMCid:PMC5678722

25. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals. J Dent. 2010;38:713-21.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.014

PMid:20546823 

26. Shamseer L, Hopewell S, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF. Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal "Instructions to Authors" in 2014. Trials. 2016;17:301.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1408-z

PMid:27343072 PMCid:PMC4921029