1. Higginson JA, Bartram AC, Banks RJ, Keith DJW. Condylar hyperplasia: current thinking. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;56:655-62.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.07.017

PMid:30115459 

2. Götz W, Lehmann TS, Appel TR, Rath-Deschner B, Dettmeyer R, Luder HU, et al. Distribution of insulin-like growth factors in condylar hyperplasia. Ann Anat. 2007;189:347-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2007.02.022

PMid:17695990 

3. Muller H. Unilateral condylar hyperplasia and acromegaly (case report). J Maxillofac Surg. 1979;7:73-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(79)80014-4

PMid:286003

4. Kessel MLJ. Condylar hyperplasia-case report. Br J Oral Surg. 1969;7:124-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-117X(69)80008-9

PMid:5260960

5. Jonck LM. Condylar hyperplasia. A case for early treatment. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:154-60.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80048-8

PMid:6797969

6. Singh GD. Morphologic determinants in the etiology of class III malocclusions: A review. Clin Anat. 1999;12:382-405.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1999)12:5<382::AID-CA9>3.0.CO;2-0

PMid:10462736

7. Glineur R, Fruhling J. Hypertrophy of the mandibular condyle: Diagnostic approach (contribution of nuclear medicine). Acta Stomatol Belg. 1991;88:85-92.

PMid:1822056

8. Rasilla JM, Arboniés JC, Gutiérrez LL. Bone SPECT-CT with 99mTc-labelled bisphosphonates. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2009;28:307-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remn.2009.08.001

PMid:19995537 

9. Gómez-Cía T, Gacto-Sánchez P, Sicilia D, Suárez C, Acha B, Serrano C, et al. The virtual reality tool VirSSPA in planning DIEP microsurgical breast reconstruction. Int J CARS. 2009;4:375-82.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-009-0311-4

PMid:20033584 

10. Chan WL, Carolan MG, Fernandes VB, Abbati DP. Planar versus SPET imaging in the assessment of condylar growth. Nucl Med Commun. 2000;21:285-90.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-200003000-00013

PMid:10823331 

11. López DF, Corrals CM. Comparison of planar bone scintigraphy and single photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of active condylar hyperplasia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44:70-4.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.026

PMid:26625976 

12. Kajan ZD, Motevasseli S, Nasab NK, Ghanepour H, Abbaspur F. Assessment of growth activity in the mandibular condyles by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Aust Orthod J. 2006;22:127-30.

PMid:17203576

13. Saridin CP, Raijmakers PGHM, Al Shamma S, Tuinzing DB, Becking AG. Comparison of different analytical methods used for analyzing SPECT scans of patients with unilateral condylar hyperactivity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:942-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.04.019

PMid:19464147 

14. Saridin CP, Raijmakers PGHM, Tuinzing DB, Becking AG. Bone scintigraphy as a diagnostic method in unilateral hyperactivity of the mandibular condyles: A review and meta-analysis of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40:11-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.09.015

PMid:20970961 

15. Pripatnanont P, Vittayakittipong P, Markmanee U, Thongmak S, Yipintsoi T. The use of SPECT to evaluate growth cessation of the mandible in unilateral condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34:364-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2004.11.002

PMid:16053843 

16. Hodder SC, Rees JIS, Oliver TB, Facey PE, Sugar AW. SPECT bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis and management of mandibular condylar hyperplasia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38:87-93.

https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.1999.0209

PMid:10864700 

17. Yang Z, Reed T, Longino BH. Bone scintigraphy SPECT/CT evaluation of mandibular condylar hyperplasia. J Nucl Med Technol. 2016;44:49-51.

https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.115.158691

PMid:26111714 

18. Henderson MJ, Wastie ML, Bromige M, Selwyn P, Smith A. Technetium-99m bone scintigraphy and mandibular condylar hyperplasia. Clin Radiol. 1990;41:411-4.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80603-8

PMid:2383957

19. Robinson PD, Harris K, Coghlan KC, Altman K. Bone scans and the timing of treatment for condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;19:243-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80402-3

PMid:2120367

20. Karssemakers LHE, Raijmakers PG, Nolte JW, Tuinzing DB, Becking AG. Interobserver variation of single-photon emission computed tomography bone scans in patients evaluated for unilateral condylar hyperactivity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115:399-405.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.11.016

PMid:23453031 

21. Björk A, Helm S. Prediction of the age of maximum puberal growth in body height. Angle Orthod. 1967;37:134-43.

PMid:4290545

22. Lima GM, Diodato S, Costabile E, Cicoria G, Civollani S, Marchetti C, et al. Low dose radiation 18F-fluoride PET/CT in the assessment of Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia of the mandible: preliminary results of a single centre experience. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2018;2:7.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-018-0025-3

PMid:29782597 PMCid:PMC5954779

23. López Buitrago DF, Muñoz Acosta JM, Cárdenas-Perilla RA. Comparison of four methods for quantitative assessment of (99m)Tc-MDP SPECT in patients with suspected condylar hyperplasia. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2019;38:72-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remnie.2018.10.003

PMid:30579914

24. Agarwal KK, Mukherjee A, St A, Tripathi M, Bal C. Incremental value of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis of active condylar hiperplasia. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38:29-34.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000607

PMid:27763953 

25. Pogrel MA, Kopf J, Dodson TB, Hattner R, Kaban LB. A comparison of single-photon emission computed tomography and planar imaging for quantitative skeletal scintigraphy of the mandibular condyle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995;80:226-31.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80206-9

PMid:7552889

26. Laverick S, Bounds G, Wong WL. [18F]-fluoride positron emission tomography for imaging condylar hyperplasia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;47:196-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.08.001

PMid:18926607 

27. Derlin T, Busch JD, Habermann CR. 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT for assessment of condylar hyperplasia. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:e48-9.

https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e31825ae727

PMid:23242067 

28. López Buitrago DF, Ruiz Botero J, Corral CM, Carmona AR, Sabogal A. Comparison of (99m)Tc-MDP SPECT qualitative vs quantitative results in patients with suspected condylar hyperplasia. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2017;36:207-11.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remnie.2017.05.007

PMid:28256425 

29. Wen B, Shen Y, Wang CY. Clinical value of 99Tcm-MDP SPECT bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of unilateral condylar hyperplasia. Sci World J. 2014;2014:256256.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/256256

PMid:24901015 PMCid:PMC4037566

30. Rushinek H, Tabib R, Fleissig Y, Klein M, Tshori S. Evaluation of three analysis methods for 99mTc MDP SPECT scintigraphy in the diagnosis of unilateral condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45:1607-13.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.07.002

PMid:27475465