­1. Gbotolorun OM, Arotiba GT, Ladeinde AL. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1977-83.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.030

PMid:17884525 

2. Benediktsdóttir IS, Wenzel A, Petersen JK, Hintze H. Mandibular third molar removal: Risk indicators for extended operation time, postoperative pain, and complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004;97:438-46.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.018

PMid:15088029 

3. Renton T, Smeeton N, McGurk M. Factors predictive of difficulty of mandibular third molar surgery. Br Dent J. 2001;190:607-10.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801052

PMid:11441899 

4. Komerik N, Muglali M, Tas B, Selcuk U. Difficulty of impacted mandibular third molar tooth removal: Predictive ability of senior surgeons and residents. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:1062-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.01.023

PMid:24656427 

5. Ferrús-Torres E, Gargallo-Albiol J, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Diagnostic predictability of digital versus conventional panoramic radiographs in the presurgical evaluation of impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:1184-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.06.023

PMid:19660912 

6. Sánchez-Torres A, Soler-Capdevila J, Ustrell-Barral M, Gay-Escoda C. Patient, radiological, and operative factors associated with surgical difficulty in the extraction of third molars: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49:655-65.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.10.009

PMid:31735527 

7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8:336-41.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007

PMid:20171303 

8. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ. 2001;323:334-6.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7308.334

PMid:11498496 PMCid:PMC1120936

9. Kim JY, Yong HS, Park KH, Huh JK. Modified difficult index adding extremely difficult for fully impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;45:309-15.

https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.6.309

PMid:31966975 PMCid:PMC6955420

10. Upadhyaya C, Chaurasia NK, Neupane I, Srivastava S. Incidence and pattern of impaction of mandibular third molars: a single institutional experience in Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2017;15:67-70.

PMid:29446366

11. de Andrade PF, Silva JNN, Sotto-Maior BS, Ribeiro CG, Devito KL, Assis NMSP. Three-dimensional analysis of impacted maxillary third molars: A cone-beam computed tomographic study of the position and depth of impaction. Imaging Sci Dent. 2017;47:149-55.

https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2017.47.3.149

PMid:28989897 PMCid:PMC5620459

12. Mahdey HM, Arora S, Wei M. Prevalence and difficulty index associated with the 3(rd) mandibular molar impaction among malaysian ethnicities: a clinico-radiographic study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:65-8.

https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/14490.6509

PMid:26501016 PMCid:PMC4606345

13. Lee JY, Do HS, Lim JH, Jang HS, Rim JS, Kwon JJ, et al. Correlation of antibiotic prophylaxis and difficulty of extraction with postoperative inflammatory complications in the lower third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52:54-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.08.010

PMid:24029441 

14. Jerjes W, El-Maaytah M, Swinson B, Upile T, Thompson G, Gittelmon S, et al. Inferior alveolar nerve injury and surgical difficulty prediction in third molar surgery: the role of dental panoramic tomography. J Clin Dent. 2006;17:122-30.

PMid:17240930

15. Jerjes W, Upile T, Kafas P, Abbas S, Rob J, McCarthy E, et al. Third molar surgery: the patient's and the clinician's perspective. Int Arch Med. 2009;2:32.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-2-32

PMid:19852848 PMCid:PMC2772836

16. García AG, Sampedro FG, Rey JG, Vila PG, Martin MS. Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38:585-7.

https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.2000.0535

PMid:11092770 

17. Yuasa H, Kawai T, Sugiura M. Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;40:26-31.

https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.2001.0684

PMid:11883966 

18. Diniz-Freitas M, Lago-Méndez L, Gude-Sampedro F, Somoza-Martin JM, Gándara-Rey JM, García-García A. Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45:23-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.12.004

PMid:16434132 

19. Akadiri OA, Fasola AO, Arotiba JT. Evaluation of Pederson index as an instrument for predicting difficulty of third molar surgical extraction. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2009;16:105-8.

PMid:19606189

20. Barreiro-Torres J, Diniz-Freitas M, Lago-Méndez L, Gude-Sampedro F, Gándara-Rey JM, García-García A. Evaluation of the surgical difficulty in lower third molar extraction. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15:869-74.

https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.15.e869

PMid:20526272 

21. Roy I, Baliga SD, Louis A, et al. Importance of clinical and radiological parameters in assessment of surgical difficulty in removal of impacted mandibular 3rd molars: a new index. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015;14:745-9.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0731-8

PMid:26225071 PMCid:PMC4511907

22. Conti M, Valente A, Catelani M, Rao S. Assessment of difficulty in third impacted mandibular molar surgery: the Conti Scale. Minerva Stomatol. 2015;64:177-88.

PMid:25937579

23. Sammartino G, Gasparro R, Marenzi G, Trosino O, Mariniello M, Riccitiello F. Extraction of mandibular third molars: proposal of a new scale of difficulty. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55:952-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.09.012

PMid:29054564 

24. Al-Samman AA. Evaluation of Kharma scale as a predictor of lower third molar extraction difficulty. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;22:796-9.

https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22082

PMid:29053661 PMCid:PMC5814000

25. de Carvalho RWF, Vasconcelos BC. Pernambuco index: predictability of the complexity of surgery for impacted lower third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47:234-40.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.013

PMid:28818641 

26. Stacchi C, Daugela P, Berton F, Lombardi T, Andriulionis T, Perinetti G, et al. A classification for assessing surgical difficulty in the extraction of mandibular impacted third molars: Description and clinical validation. Quintessence Int. 2018;49:745-53.

PMid:30027171

27. Zhang X, Wang L, Gao Z, Li J, Shan Z. Development of a New Index to assess the difficulty level of surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars in an asian population. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.03.005

PMid:30959010 

28. Sainz de Baranda B, Silvestre FJ, Silvestre-Rangil J. Relationship between surgical difficulty of third molar extraction under local anesthesia and the postoperative evolution of clinical and blood parameters. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:1337-45.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.02.020

PMid:30878593 

29. Juodzbalys G, Daugela P. Mandibular third molar impaction: review of literature and a proposal of a classification. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2013;4:1.

https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2013.4201

PMid:24422029

30. Manuel S, Surej Kumar LK, Varghese MP. A comprehensive proforma for evaluation of mandibular third molar impactions. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014;13:378-85.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-013-0543-2

PMid:26225000 PMCid:PMC4518789

31. Garcia Garcia A, Gude Sampedro F, Gandara Rey J, Gallas Torreira M. Trismus and pain after removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:1223-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90172-5

PMid:9371111

32. Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Estimating third molar extraction difficulty: a comparison of subjective and objective factors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:427-34.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.12.003

PMid:15789312 

33. Ashton-James CE, Forouzanfar T, Costa D. The contribution of patients' presurgery perceptions of surgeon attributes to the experience of trust and pain during third molar surgery. Pain Rep. 2019;4:754.

https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000754

PMid:31583364 PMCid:PMC6749897

34. Sisk AL, Hammer WB, Shelton DW, Joy ED Jr. Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44:855-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(86)90221-1

PMid:3464711

35. Jerjes W, El-Maaytah M, Swinson B, Banu B, Upile T, D'Sa S. Experience versus complication rate in third molar surgery. Head Face Med. 2006;2:14.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-2-14

PMid:16725024 PMCid:PMC1481631

36. Berge TI, Gilhuus-Moe OT. Per- and post-operative variables of mandibular third-molar surgery by four general practitioners and one oral surgeon. Acta Odontol Scand. 1993;51:389-97.

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040590

PMid:8304016 

37. Subramonian K, Muir G. The 'learning curve' in surgery: what is it, how do we measure it and can we influence it? BJU Int. 2004;93:1173-4.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04891.x

PMid:15180598 

38. Benzel EC, Orr RD. A steep learning curve is a good thing! Spine J. 2011;11:131-2.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.12.012

PMid:21296296 

39. Mufson RA. The influence of experience on complication rates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45:906.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(87)90436-8

PMid:3478436

40. Qu R, Wang J, Li J, Dong Z, Yang J, Liu D, et al. The learning curve for surgeons regarding endoscopic thyroidectomy via the oral-vestibular approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018;28:380-4.

https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000578

PMid:30222694