Tzortzakis NG, Damaskos S, Dimakopoulou K, Chatzipetros E, Angelopoulos C. Periapical radiographs vs cone beam CT imaging for the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects: an ex vivo study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 May 1;30 (3):e322-32.
doi:10.4317/medoral.26777
https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.26777
1. Galindo-Moreno P, Catena A, Pérez-Sayáns M, Fernández-Barbero JE, O'Valle F, Padial-Molina M. Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: A retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022;24:630-42. |
PMid:35831919 PMCid:PMC9796358 |
2. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91:242-48. |
PMid:22157097 |
3. Serino G, Turri A. Outcome of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: results from a 2-year prospective clinical study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1214-20. |
PMid:21309860 |
4. Schwarz F, Sahm N, Schwarz K, Becker J. Impact of defect configuration on the clinical outcome following surgical regenerative therapy of peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37:449-55. |
PMid:20374416 |
5. Karoussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Brägger U, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:329-39. |
PMid:12755783 |
6. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Worthington HV. Treatment of peri-implantitis: what interventions are effective? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5:21-41. |
PMID: 22834392 |
7. Dukka H, Dietrich T, Saleh MHA, Troiano G, Yonel Z, Ravidà A, et al. Prognostic performance of the 2017 World Workshop classification on staging and grading of periodontitis compared with the British Society of Periodontology's implementation. J Periodontol. 2022;93:537-47. |
PMid:34314515 |
8. García-García M, Mir-Mari J, Benic GI, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E. Accuracy of periapical radiography in assessing bone level in implants affected by peri-implantitis: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43:85-91. |
PMid:26660842 |
9. Eickholz P, Hausmann E. Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108:70-73. |
PMid:10706480 |
10. Lang NP, Hill RW. Radiographs in periodontics. J Clin Periodontol. 1977;4:16-28. |
PMid:321483 |
11. Ritter L, Elger MC, Rothamel D, Fienitz T, Zinser M, Schwarz F, et al. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43:20130088. |
PMid:24786136 PMCid:PMC4141670 |
12. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113:817-26. |
PMid:22668710 |
13. Song D, Shujaat S, de Faria Vasconcelos K, Huang Y, Politis C, Lambrichts I, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri-implant bone defects. BMC Med Imaging. 2021;21:23. |
PMid:33568085 PMCid:PMC7877020 |
14. Corpas Ldos S, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, Huang Y, Naert I, Duyck J. Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomography analyses to the histological standard. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:492-99. |
PMid:21143531 |
15. Ritter L, Elger MC, Rothamel D, Fienitz T, Zinser M, Schwarz F, et al. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;4:20130088. |
PMid:24786136 PMCid:PMC4141670 |
16. Bornstein MM, Horner K, Jacobs R. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73:51-72. |
PMid:28000270 |
17. Bohner LOL, Mukai E, Oderich E, Porporatti AL, Pacheco-Pereira C, Tortamano P, et al. Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;124:432-40. |
PMid:28743664 |
18. Pelekos G, Acharya A, Tonetti MS, Bornstein MM. Diagnostic performance of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:443-64. |
PMid:29578266 |
19. Zhang CN, Zhu Y, Fan LF, Zhang X, Jiang YH, Gu YX. Intra- and inter-observer agreements in detecting peri-implant bone defects between periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography: A clinical study. J Dent Sci. 2021;16:948-56. |
PMid:34141109 PMCid:PMC8189872 |
20. Dave M, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer R. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri-implant bone defects. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:671-78. |
PMid:22458628 |
21. Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M, Bieling K, Sculean A, Becker J. Comparison of naturally occurring and ligature-induced peri-implantitis bone defects in humans and dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:161-70. |
PMid:17348880 |
22. Shelley AM, Brunton P, Horner K. Subjective image quality assessment of cross-sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement. J Dent. 2011;39:764-70. |
PMid:21875641 |
23. Hatcher DC. Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;3:3-6. |
PMid:20884933 |
24. Kurt MH, Bağış N, Evli C, Atakan C, Orhan K. Comparison of the different voxel sizes in the estimation of peri-implant fenestration defects using cone beam computed tomography: an ex vivo study. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6:58. |
PMid:33006000 PMCid:PMC7530157 |
25. Sewerin IP, Gotfredsen K, Stoltze K. Accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of peri-implant radiolucencies--an in vitro experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:299-04. |
PMid:9586477 |
26. Razavi T, Palmer RM, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer PJ. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:718-25. |
PMid:20636726 |
27. Kolsuz ME, Bagis N, Orhan K, Avsever H, Demiralp KÖ. Comparison of the influence of FOV sizes and different voxel resolutions for the assessment of periodontal defects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20150070. |
PMid:25900235 PMCid:PMC4628412 |
28. Brüllmann D, Schulze RK. Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications-what do we know today? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20140204. |
PMid:25168812 PMCid:PMC4614158 |
29. Serino G, Wada M, Mameno T, Stavropoulos A. Radiographic bone level and soft tissue dimensional changes following explantation of implants affected by peri-implantitis: A retrospective exploratory evaluation. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023;9:945-53. |
PMid:37905730 PMCid:PMC10728526 |
30. Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Bosmans H, Panmekiate S. Reduction of scatter-induced image noise in cone beam computed tomography: effect of field of view size and position. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016;121:188-95. |
PMid:26792756 |