Boronat-López A, Bernabeu-Mira JC, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Oltra D. Dimensional changes in buccal cortical bone and lesion volume in teeth with persistent chronic periapical disease subjected to periapical surgery: a cone beam computed tomography study at one year of follow-up. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 May 1;30 (3):e469-75.


doi:10.4317/medoral.27006

https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.27006


1. Harada S, Rodan GA. Control of osteoblast function and regulation of bone mass. Nature. 2003;423:349-55.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01660

PMid:12748654 

2. Araújo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, Sukekava F. Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn?. Periodontol 2000. 2015;68:122-34.

https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12082

PMid:25867983 

3. Huynh-Ba G, Pjetursson BE, Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferrus J, Lindhe J, et al. Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:37-42.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01870.x

PMid:20070745 

4. Weiss R-2nd, Read-Fuller A. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review. Dent J (Basel). 2019;7:52.

https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7020052

PMid:31052495 PMCid:PMC6631689

5. Behnia H, Motamedian SR, Kiani MT, Morad G, Khojasteh A. Accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomographic measurements of the bone labial and palatal to the maxillary anterior teeth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30:1249-55.

https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3856

PMid:26478968 

6. Li Y, Deng S, Mei L, Li J, Qi M, Su S, et al. Accuracy of alveolar bone height and thickness measurements in cone beam computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;128:667-79.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.05.010

PMid:31311766 

7. Januário AL, Duarte WR, Barriviera M, Mesti JC, Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1168-71.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02086.x

PMid:21320168 

8. El Nahass H, N Naiem S. Analysis of the dimensions of the labial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:e57-61.

https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12332

PMid:24450845 

9. Rojo-Sanchis J, Viña-Almunia J, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Facial Alveolar Bone Width at the First and Second Maxillary Premolars in Healthy Patients: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. J Oral Implantol. 2017;43:261-5.

https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00195

PMid:28421873 

10. Ghassemian M, Nowzari H, Lajolo C, Verdugo F, Pirronti T, D'Addona A. The thickness of facial alveolar bone overlying healthy maxillary anterior teeth. J Periodontol. 2012;83:187-97.

https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110172

PMid:21692627 

11. Braut V, Bornstein MM, Belser U, Buser D. Thickness of the anterior maxillary facial bone wall-a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31:125-31.

PMid:21491011

12. von Arx T, Antonini L, Salvi GE, Bornstein MM. Changes of Periodontal Parameters after Apical Surgery: Correlation of Clinical and Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Data. J Endod. 2017;43:876-84.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.016

PMid:28416313 

13. Ramanauskaite A, Becker K, Kassira HC, Becker J, Sader R, Schwarz F. The dimensions of the facial alveolar bone at tooth sites with local pathologies: a retrospective cone-beam CT analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:1551-60.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03057-x

PMid:31414272 

14. AlTarawneh S, AlHadidi A, Hamdan AA, Shaqman M, Habib E. Assessment of Bone Dimensions in the Anterior Maxilla: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. J Prosthodont. 2018;27:321-8.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12675

PMid:29235201 

15. Wang HM, Shen JW, Yu MF, Chen XY, Jiang QH, He FM. Analysis of facial bone wall dimensions and sagittal root position in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:1123-9.

https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3348

PMid:25216138 

16. Zekry A, Wang R, Chau AC, Lang NP. Facial alveolar bone wall width - a cone-beam computed tomography study in Asians. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:194-206.

https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12096

PMid:23294441 

17. Vera C, De Kok IJ, Reinhold D, Limpiphipatanakorn P, Yap AK, Tyndall D, et al. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:1514-9.

PMid:23189304

18. Rubinstein RA, Kim S. Long-term follow-up of cases considered healed one year after apical microsurgery. J Endod. 2002;28:378-83.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200205000-00008

PMid:12026924 

19. Kim D, Ku H, Nam T, Yoon TC, Lee CY, Kim E. Influence of Size and Volume of Periapical Lesions on the Outcome of Endodontic Microsurgery: 3-Dimensional Analysis Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J Endod. 2016;42:1196-201.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.05.006

PMid:27339630 

20. Ramis-Alario A, Tarazona-Álvarez B, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Soto-Peñaloza D, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Oltra D. The study of bone healing after endodontic microsurgery using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective cohort study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14:e652-60.

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.58354

PMid:36046171 PMCid:PMC9422972

21. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2000;284:3043-5.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.23.3043

PMid:36046171 PMCid:PMC9422972

22. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:344-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008

PMid:18313558 

23. Schloss T, Sonntag D, Kohli MR, Setzer FC. A Comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional Healing Assessment after Endodontic Surgery Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Volumes or Periapical Radiographs. J Endod. 2017;43:1072-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.02.007

PMid:28527841 

24. von Arx T, Hänni S, Jensen SS. Correlation of bone defect dimensions with healing outcome one year after apical surgery. J Endod. 2007;33:1044-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.06.010

PMid:17931929 

25. Kreisler M, Gockel R, Aubell-Falkenberg S, Kreisler T, Weihe C, Filippi A, et al. Clinical outcome in periradicular surgery: effect of patient- and tooth-related factors--a multicenter study. Quintessence Int. 2013;44:53-60.

PMid:23444162

26. Song M, Kim SG, Shin SJ, Kim HC, Kim E. The influence of bone tissue deficiency on the outcome of endodontic microsurgery: a prospective study. J Endod. 2013;39:1341-5.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.036

PMid:24139252 

27. Kopacz M, Neal JJ, Suffridge C, Webb TD, Mathys J, Brooks D, et al. A Clinical Evaluation of Cone-beam Computed Tomography: Implications for Endodontic Microsurgery. J Endod. 2021;47:895-901.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2021.03.014

PMid:33798543 

28. Curtis DM, VanderWeele RA, Ray JJ, Wealleans JA. Clinician-centered Outcomes Assessment of Retreatment and Endodontic Microsurgery Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Volumetric Analysis. J Endod. 2018;44:1251-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.03.016

PMid:29970237