Gil-Pozo A,
Medina-Sotomayor P. Two possible in vitro alternatives to evaluate the
effect of gastric acid on resin-based composites. J Clin Exp Dent.
2022;14(9):e719-25.
doi:10.4317/jced.59782
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59782
___________
References
|
1.
Carvalho TS, Colon P, Ganss C, Huysmans MC, Lussi A, Schlueter N, et al.
Consensus report of the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry:
erosive tooth wear-diagnosis and management. Clin Oral Investig.
2015;19:1557-1561. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Shahramian K, Hupa L, Donovan TE, Vallittu P, et
al. Impact of gastric acidic challenge on surface topography and optical
properties of monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater. 2015;31:1445-1452. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Pace F, Pallotta S, Tonini M, Vakil N, Bianchi Porro G. Systematic review:
Gastroesophageal reflux disease and dental lesions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2008;27:1179-1186. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.
Zafar MS, Amin F, Fareed MA, Ghabbani H, Riaz S, Khurshid Z, et al.
Biomimetic aspects of restorative dentistry biomaterials. Biomimetics. 2020;5:34. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.
Alzraikat H, Burrow M, Maghaireh G, Taha N. Nanofilled Resin Composite
Properties and Clinical Performance: A Review. Oper Dent. 2018;43:173-190. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.
Randolph LD, Palin WM, Leloup G, Leprince JG. Filler characteristics of
modern dental resin composites and their influence on physico-mechanical properties.
Dent Mater. 2016;32:1586-1599. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Osiewicz A, Werner A, Roeters FJM, Kleverlaan CJ. Wear of direct resin
composites and teeth: considerations for oral rehabilitation. Eur J Oral Sci.
2019;127:156-161. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.
Vailati F, Gruetter L, Belser UC. Adhesively restored anterior maxillary dentitions
affected by severe erosion: up to 6-year results of a prospective clinical
study. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013;8:506-30. PMid:24624375 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.
Lazaridou D, Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Are resin composites suitable
replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear. Clin Oral Investig.
2015;19:1485-1492. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.
Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Sokolowski J, Kleczewska J, Bociong K. Ageing of
dental composites based on methacrylate resins-A critical review of the
causes and method of assessment. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12:1-18. |
|
|
|
|
|
11.
Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N. Long-term sorption and
solubility of bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites in water and
artificial saliva. J Dent. 2015;43:1511-8. |
|
|
|
|
|
12.
Svizero R, Regina A, Grando C, Bueno TDL, Di V, Kljkhu WKH, et al.
Micro-sized erosions in a nanofilled composite after repeated acidic beverage
exposures: consequences of clusters dislodgments. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014;22:373-81. |
|
|
|
|
|
13.
Cilli R, Pereira JC, Prakki A. Properties of dental resins submitted to pH
catalysed hydrolysis. J Dent. 2012;40:1144-1150. |
|
|
|
|
|
14.
Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Does artificial
aging affect mechanical properties of CAD/CAM composite materials. J
Prosthodont Res. 2018;62:65-74. |
|
|
|
|
|
15.
Van Landuyt KL, Nawrot T, Geebelen B, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Yoshihara K,
et al. How much do resin-based dental materials release? A meta-analytical approach.
Dent Mater. 2011;27:723-47. |
|
|
|
|
|
16.
Backer AD, Münchow EA, Eckert GJ, Hara AT, Platt JA, Bottino MC. Effects of
simulated gastric juice on CAD/CAM resin composites-morphological and
mechanical evaluations. J Prosthodont. 2017;26:424-431. |
|
|
|
|
|
17.
West NX, Davies M, Amaechi BT. In vitro and in situ erosion models for
evaluating tooth substance loss. Caries Res. 2011;45:43-52. |
|
|
|
|
|
18.
Cabral AC, Lima LO, Terossi de Godoi AP, Colucci V, Milori Corona SA, Benitez
Catirse ABCE. Surface Roughness of Composite Resins Subjected to Hydrochloric
Acid. Braz Dent J. 2015;26:268-271. |
|
|
|
|
|
19.
Kulkarni A, Rothrock J, Thompson J. Impact of Gastric Acid Induced Surface
Changes on Mechanical Behavior and Optical Characteristics of Dental Ceramics.
J Prosthodont. 2018;29:207-218. |
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Albuquerque AP, Oliveira-Reis B, Catelan A, Suzuki TYU, Briso ALF, Santos PH
Dos. Mechanical and surface properties analysis of restorative materials
submitted to erosive challenges in situ. Eur J Dent. 2018;12:559-65. |
|
|
|
|
|
21.
Cruz ME, Simões R, Martins SB, Trindade FZ, Dovigo LN, Fonseca RG. Influence
of simulated gastric juice on surface characteristics of CAD-CAM monolithic
materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:483-490. |
|
|
|
|
|
22.
Alencar MF, Pereira MT, De-Moraes MDR, Santiago SL, Passos VF. The effects of
intrinsic and extrinsic acids on nanofilled and bulk fill resin composites:
Roughness, surface hardness, and scanning electron microscopy analysis.
Microsc Res Tech. 2020;83:202-207. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.
Shellis RP, Ganss C, Ren Y, Zero DT, Lussi A. Methodology and Models in
Erosion Research: Discussion and Conclusions. Caries Res. 2011;45:69-77. |
|
|
|
|
|
24.
Wiegand A, Attin T. Design of erosion/abrasion studies - Insights and
rational concepts. Caries Res. 2011;45:53-59. |
|
|
|
|
|
25.
Yap A, Eweis A, Yahya N. Dynamic and static flexural appraisal of resin-based
composites: Comparison of the ISO and Mini-flexural tests. Oper Dent. 2018;43:223-231. |
|
|
|
|
|
26.
International Organization for Standardization (2018). ISO-6507-1:2018.
Metallic materials -Vickers hardness test - Part 1: Test method. Geneva,
Suiza. |
|
|
|
|
|
27.
International Organization for Standardization (2009). ISO
4049:2009.Dentistry - Polymer-based restorative materials. 5th ed. Geneva,
Suiza. |
|
|
|
|
|
28.
Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks.
Dent Mater. 2006;22:211-222. |
|
|
|
|
|
29.
Quinn JB, Quinn GD. A practical and systematic review of Weibull statistics
for reporting strengths of dental materials. Dent Mater. 2010;26:135-147. |
|